ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
A Comparison of the Fifth World Health Organization and the International Consensus Classifications of Mature T-Cell Lymphomas.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Editorial: Rare hematological malignancies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Cutaneous Intravascular Hematolymphoid Entities: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Immunogenetic Background of Chronic Lymphoproliferative Disorders in Romanian Patients-Case Control Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Short histological kaleidoscope - recent findings in histology. Part IV.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are a rare subset of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that often carry significant difficulty in diagnosis and classification because of their rarity and biological complexity. Previous editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications of hemopoietic neoplasms in 2001, 2008, and 2017 aimed to standardize hemopoietic neoplasm diagnosis in general. Since then, crucial clinico-pathological, immunophenotypic, and recent molecular discoveries have been made in the field of lymphomas, contributing to refining diagnostic criteria of several diseases, upgrading entities previously defined as provisional, and identifying new entities. In 2022, two different models were proposed to classify hematolymphoid neoplasms: the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). Of note, a common nosography is mandatory to ensure progress in health science and ensure the basis for a real precision medicine. In this article, the authors summarized the main differences with the previous fourth WHO edition and reviewed the main discrepancies between the two newest classifications, as far as PTCLs are concerned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.