Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37762349›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Role of Soluble ST2 Biomarker in Predicting Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Electrical Cardioversion or Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Javier García-Seara, Laila González Melchor, Javier Rodríguez García, Francisco Gude, José Luis Martínez Sande, Moisés Rodríguez Mañero, Xesús Alberte Fernández López, Carlos Minguito Carazo, Teba González Ferrero, Sonia Eiras and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Javier García-SearaCardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Laila González MelchorCardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4065-221X
Javier Rodríguez GarcíaClinical Analysis Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5631-2981
Francisco GudeInstitute of Biomedical Research of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS-SERGAS), Travesía da Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9681-1662
José Luis Martínez SandeCardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Moisés Rodríguez MañeroCardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Xesús Alberte Fernández LópezCardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Carlos Minguito CarazoCardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Teba González FerreroCardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Sonia EirasCentro de Investigación Biomédica Cardiovascular en Red (CIBERCV), Institute of Health Carlos III, C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, Planta 0, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo LageCentro de Investigación Biomédica Cardiovascular en Red (CIBERCV), Institute of Health Carlos III, C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, Planta 0, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Isabel MoscosoCentro de Investigación Biomédica Cardiovascular en Red (CIBERCV), Institute of Health Carlos III, C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, Planta 0, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Sandra Feijoo BandínCentro de Investigación Biomédica Cardiovascular en Red (CIBERCV), Institute of Health Carlos III, C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, Planta 0, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3739-5806
Francisca LagoCentro de Investigación Biomédica Cardiovascular en Red (CIBERCV), Institute of Health Carlos III, C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, Planta 0, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Ezequiel AlvarezDepartment of Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Clara V AlvarezNeoplasia & Endocrine Differentiation, Centro de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CIMUS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
José Ramón González JuanateyCardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9681-3388
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to determine the predictive value of the soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) biomarker in atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. This prospective, observational study included patients with AF referred for electrical cardioversion (ECV) or pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures. Baseline characteristics were collected, and sST2 was determined at baseline and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. sST2 was determined at baseline in a matched control group. Left atrial voltage mapping was performed in patients undergoing PVI. The sST2 maximal predictive capacity of AF recurrence was at the 3-month FU in the cohort of patients undergoing ECV with respect to 6-month AF recurrence with an AUC of 0.669, a cut-off point of 15,511 pg/mL, a sensitivity of 60.97%, and a specificity of 69.81%. The ROC curve of the sST2 biomarker at baseline and 3 months in the cohort of patients undergoing PVI showed AUCs of 0.539 and 0.490, respectively. The logistic regression model identified the rhythm (AF) and the sST2 biomarker at 3 months as independent factors for recurrence at 6 months in the ECV cohort. In the logistic regression model, sST2 was not an independent factor for recurrence at 6 months of follow-up in the PVI cohort. In patients who underwent ECV, sST2 values at 3 months may provide utility to predict AF recurrence at 6 months of follow-up. In patients who underwent PVI, sST2 had no value in predicting AF recurrence at 6 months of follow-up.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationPulmonary VeinsBiomarkersElectric CountershockHumansInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 ProteinProspective StudiesBiomarkersInterleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Proteinatrial fibrillationelectrical cardioversionpulmonary vein ablationsoluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2)

Identifiers

PMID37762349
PMCPMC10531224
OpenAlexW4386748720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.