ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
CuReSim-LoRM: A Tool to Simulate Metabarcoding Long Reads.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Profiling of vaginal microbial communities in Chilean women via self-sampling and nanopore sequencing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabarcoding DNA sequencing has revolutionized the study of microbial communities. Third-generation sequencing producing long reads had opened up new perspectives. Obtaining the full-length ribosomal RNA gene would permit one to reach a better taxonomic resolution at the species or the strain level. However, Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing produces reads with high error rates, which introduces biases in analysis. Understanding the biases introduced during the analysis allows one to better interpret the biological results and take care of conclusions drawn from metabarcoding experiments. To benchmark an analysis process, the ground truth, i.e., the real composition of the microbial community, has to be known. In addition to artificial mock communities, simulated data are often used to evaluate the biases and performances of the bioinformatics analysis step. Currently, no specific tool has been developed to simulate metabarcoding long reads, mimic the error rate and the length distribution, and allow one to benchmark the analysis process. Here, we introduce CuReSim-LoRM, for the customized read simulator to generate long reads for metabarcoding. We showed that CuReSim-LoRM is able to produce reads with varying error rates and length distributions by mimicking the real data very well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.