Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761779›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Personalised Online Upper-Limb Physiotherapy for Stroke Survivors during the Inpatient Phase: A Feasibility Study.

Abdullah Ibrahim Alhusayni, Eileen Stewart Cowey, Elaine Coulter, Mark Barber, Lorna Paul

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06871878 (PeRsonAlised Community Based TelerehabIlitation Post StrokE to Increase Rehabilitation Time and Improve Motor Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06871878 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

PeRsonAlised Community Based TelerehabIlitation Post StrokE to Increase Rehabilitation Time and Improve Motor Recovery: a Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlasgow Caledonian UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsStroke Patients, StrokeArmsPRACTISE Physiotherapy Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Safety of Telerehabilitation: Systematic Review.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abdullah Ibrahim AlhusayniCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, Shaqra University, Sahqra 11961, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0007-1807-4015
Eileen Stewart CoweyNursing & Health Care School, University of Glasgow, Scotland G12 8QQ, UK.
Elaine CoulterSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Mark BarberNHS Lanarkshire, Scotland G67 1BJ, UK.
Lorna PaulSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2869-0309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter a stroke, inpatients often receive less than the recommended dose of therapy. Telerehabilitation may assist by providing personalised rehabilitation programmes without face-to-face therapy time. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of an individualised programme of upper-limb rehabilitation that is delivered via an online rehabilitation platform for inpatient stroke survivors.

methodsStroke survivors were recruited from three stroke units in one NHS Board in Scotland and randomised to the intervention (personalised upper-limb exercise programme delivered via an online physiotherapy platform for four weeks, up to 30 min five times per week, in addition to usual care) or the control group (usual care). The main outcomes are related to recruitment, attrition, adherence and safety. The clinical measures were the Action Research Arm Test, Trunk Impairment Scale and Modified Ashworth Scale. The intervention participants, their carers and physiotherapists completed questionnaires on the acceptability of the intervention.

resultsTwenty-six participants, 42% males, were recruited around three weeks post-stroke, on average. There were 13 participants in each group, with a mean age of 69 years (SD of 12) and 67 years (SD of 11) for the control and intervention groups, respectively. Overall, 47% of those screened for eligibility were randomised, and attrition was 23% in the intervention group mainly due to discharge before the end of the intervention. Participants who adhered to their programme (completed more than two-thirds), generally those with an engaged carer, demonstrated a trend toward improved clinical outcomes. Overall, the patients, carers and physiotherapists were positive regarding the intervention. There was a total of five reported adverse events, none of which were related to the study.

conclusionAn upper-limb unsupervised exercise intervention using an online physiotherapy platform for inpatient stroke survivors is feasible, safe and acceptable to patients, carers and physiotherapists. A fully powered RCT is warranted to investigate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of such interventions for this patient group.

Indexed as

physiotherapystroketask-specific exercisestelerehabilitationupper limb

Identifiers

PMID37761779
PMCPMC10531470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.