Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761769›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Pandemic Preparedness: A Scoping Review of Best and Worst Practices from COVID-19.

Alessia Maccaro, Camilla Audia, Katy Stokes, Haleema Masud, Sharifah Sekalala, Leandro Pecchia, Davide Piaggio

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Living With Spasticity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study of Patient, Carer and Physician Experiences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessia MaccaroSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Library Rd., Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9338-9884
Camilla AudiaGlobal Sustainable Development, School for Cross-Faculty Studies, University of Warwick, Library Rd., Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1504-9750
Katy StokesSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Library Rd., Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0766-6836
Haleema MasudInstitute of Advanced Studies, University of Warwick, Library Rd., Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Sharifah SekalalaSchool of Law, University of Warwick, Library Rd., Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Leandro PecchiaSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Library Rd., Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Davide PiaggioSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Library Rd., Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5408-9360
University of Warwick · GBUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 224856/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the scale of global unpreparedness to deal with the fast-arising needs of global health threats. This problem was coupled with a crisis of governance and presented in the context of globally hitting climate crisis and disasters. Although such a pandemic was predictable due to the known effects of human intervention on the surrounding environment and its devastating secondary effects, such as climate change and increased zoonoses, most countries were unprepared to deal with the scale and scope of the pandemic. In this context, such as that of the climate crisis, the Global North and Global South faced several common challenges, including, first and foremost, the scarcity of resources required for health, policy, wellbeing and socioeconomic wellness. In this paper, we review the most recent evidence available in the literature related to pandemic preparedness and governance, focusing on principles and practices used during the COVID-19 pandemic, and we place it in the context of a European Parliament Interest Group meeting (this event took place on 21 March 2023 during the "European Health Tech Summit") to ground it within ongoing discussions and narratives of policy and praxis. The review identified key practices and principles required to better face future health threats and emergencies. Beyond health practices relying on technology and innovation, it is useful to mention the importance of contextualising responses and linking them to clear goals, improving the agreement between science and policymaking, thus building trust and enabling transparent communication with the general public based on clear ethical frameworks.

Indexed as

best practicesCOVID-19ethicshealth practicespandemicpreparednessscience–policy–society interactionsscoping review

Identifiers

PMID37761769
PMCPMC10530798
OpenAlexW4386831567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.