Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761736›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Areas of Concern and Support among the Austrian General Population: A Qualitative Content Analytic Mapping of the Shift between Winter 2020/21 and Spring 2022.

Afsaneh Gächter, Barbara Zauner, Katja Haider, Yvonne Schaffler, Thomas Probst, Christoph Pieh, Elke Humer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Afsaneh GächterDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.
Barbara ZaunerDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0009-0004-4624-1384
Katja HaiderDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7530-180X
Yvonne SchafflerDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4068-8930
Thomas ProbstDivision of Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-2133
Christoph PiehDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2708-303X
Elke HumerDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9776-0353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze areas of concern and support of the Austrian general population two years into the COVID-19 pandemic. A representative sample (N = 1031) of the Austrian general population was surveyed online between 19 April 2022 and 26 April 2022. A qualitative study design was used to explore the factors of most considerable current concern (Question 1) and the most important sources of support (Question 2). The responses to the two open-ended questions were evaluated using a conventional content analysis, and categories were formed according to the frequency of the answers. The analysis revealed that inflation and finances (30% of participants) and the war in Ukraine (22%) were the greatest sources of concern, followed by mental health (11%), and physical health (11%). Factors such as social contacts within and outside the family were mentioned most frequently as sources of support (36% of participants), followed by recreational activities (23%) and attitudes and abilities (22%). Compared to data collected at the end of the first year of the pandemic (between 23 December 2020 and 4 January 2021), concern about one's financial situation was now mentioned more frequently (30% vs. 8,5%). On the other hand, different types of pandemic-related concerns were mentioned less often. Social contacts and recreation were mentioned as the most important sources of support at both time points (46% and 36% of the participants). The results suggest that the economic concerns are lagging behind the restrictions imposed by the pandemic. In addition, the impending war in Ukraine seems to have a relevant impact on mental health in Austria. Further nuanced qualitative research, particularly involving vulnerable groups such as low-income individuals and the unemployed, is crucial.

Indexed as

Austriaconcernscontent analysisinflationpandemicresourceswar in Ukraine

Identifiers

PMID37761736
PMCPMC10530781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.