Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761685›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

How to Use Lean Thinking for the Optimization of Clinical Pathways: A Systematic Review and a Proposed Framework to Analyze Pathways on a System Level.

Joanna R G Vijverberg, Marc B V Rouppe van der Voort, Paul B van der Nat, Machteld J Mosselman, Sander Rigter, Douwe H Biesma, Frits van Merode

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The maturity of lean management in a large academic medical center in Finland: a qualitative study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  4. Slack Is Needed to Solve the Shortage of Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joanna R G VijverbergCare and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-3808
Marc B V Rouppe van der VoortDepartment of Juiste Zorg, Juiste Plaats, Juiste Kosten, St. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Paul B van der NatDepartment of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0990-073X
Machteld J MosselmanDepartment of Juiste Zorg, Juiste Plaats, Juiste Kosten, St. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Sander RigterDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, St. Antonius Hospital, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Douwe H BiesmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frits van MerodeCare and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1918-3487

Funding

Care And Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University xSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis x
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lean Thinking and clinical pathways are commonly used concepts to improve healthcare. However, little is known on how to use Lean Thinking for the optimization of pathways or the quantification of both concepts. This study aims to create a framework to analyze pathways with Lean Thinking on a system level, by quantifying the seven wastes, flow and pull. A systematic literature review was performed. Inclusion criteria were the focus of the article on a well-defined group of patients and studied a pathway optimization with Lean Thinking. Data were extracted on measured outcomes, type of intervention and type of researched pathway. Thirty-six articles were included. No articles described the implementation of the Lean Thinking philosophy or studied the development of their people and partners ("4 P" model). Most articles used process optimization tools or problem-solving tools. The majority of the studies focused on process measures. The measures found in the review were used as input for our suggested framework to identify and quantify wastes, flow, and pull in a clinical pathway. The proposed framework can be used to create an overview of the improvement potential of a pathway or to analyze the level of improvement after an enhancement is introduced to a pathway. Further research is needed to study the use of the suggested quantifications.

Indexed as

clinical pathwayimprovement potentiallean thinkingquantification

Identifiers

PMID37761685
PMCPMC10530850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.