Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761665›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Swahili Version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-BR45 among Breast Cancer Patients in Tanzania.

Paulo L Kidayi, Amir H Pakpour, Fredrik Saboonchi, Freddie Bray, Hélio Manhica, Christina C Mtuya, Furaha Serventi, Ragnhild E Aune, Michael J Mahande, Gunilla Björling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Adaptation and initial psychometric validation of the Latvian version of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR45 in women with breast cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paulo L KidayiFaculty of Nursing, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi 2240, Tanzania.
Amir H PakpourDepartment of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, SE-55111 Jönköping, Sweden.
Fredrik SaboonchiDepartment of Health Sciences, Swedish Red Cross University, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
Freddie BrayCancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, F-69372 Lyon, France.
Hélio ManhicaDepartment of Health Promotion, Sophiahemmet University, SE-114 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Christina C MtuyaFaculty of Nursing, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi 2240, Tanzania.
Furaha ServentiCancer Care Centre, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi P.O. Box 3010, Tanzania.
Ragnhild E AuneDepartment of Material Sciences, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Michael J MahandeFaculty of Nursing, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi 2240, Tanzania.
Gunilla BjörlingFaculty of Nursing, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi 2240, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-1445-900X

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women in Africa and contributes to premature death and poor quality of life. This study aimed to determine the validity, reliability, and psychometric properties of the Swahili version of EORTC QLQ-BR45 among women with breast cancer in Tanzania. A cross-sectional study design with non-probability convenience sampling was employed. Data were collected in two tertiary hospitals and one national cancer institute; 414 participants completed the EORTC-QLQ-C-30 and EORTC-QLQ-BR45. The reliability of QLQ-BR45 was measured using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega coefficients. The factor structure of EORTC QLQ-BR45 was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis. The internal consistencies for the five dimensions were all above 0.7 indicating satisfaction, except for systemic therapy side effects with a marginal value of 0.594 and significant correlations between the dimensions of QLQ-C30 and BR45. The final model fit well to the data, with the comparative fit index = 0.953, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.947, root mean square error of approximation = 0.041 (90% CI: 0.035, 0.046), and standardized root mean square residual = 0.072. In conclusion, the QLQ BR45 Swahili version displayed good reliability, validity, and psychometric properties and can be used in Swahili-speaking Sub-Saharan countries.

Indexed as

breast cancerpsychometric propertiesquality of lifereliabilityvalidation

Identifiers

PMID37761665
PMCPMC10530899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.