Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761501›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Use of Suctioning during Newborn Resuscitation and Its Effects on Heart Rate in a Low-Resource Setting, Tanzania.

Carolyn Purington, Joar Eilevstjønn, Ingvild Dalen, Anita Yeconia, Ladislaus Blacy, Estomih Mduma, Ingunn Haug, Kari Holte, Catherine Chang, Jeffrey Perlman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Immediate heart rate changes in late preterm infants receiving resuscitation in the delivery room.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Carolyn PuringtonDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5994-2786
Joar EilevstjønnStrategic Research, Laerdal Medical, 4007 Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-2689
Ingvild DalenDepartment of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, 4019 Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8160-3211
Anita YeconiaHaydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom 9000, Tanzania.
Ladislaus BlacyHaydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom 9000, Tanzania.
Estomih MdumaHaydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom 9000, Tanzania.
Ingunn HaugStrategic Research, Laerdal Medical, 4007 Stavanger, Norway.
Kari HolteDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescence Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, 1714 Grålum, Norway.
Catherine ChangWeill Cornell Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7559-4817
Jeffrey PerlmanWeill Cornell Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Hege ErsdalFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway.
Haydom Lutheran Hospital · TZCornell University · USLaerdal (Norway) · NOStavanger University Hospital · NOHarvard Pilgrim Health Care · USØstfold Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

GLOBVAC NALaerdal Foundation NANorwegian Research Council NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suctioning of newborns immediately after birth, as part of delivery room resuscitation, is only recommended if the airway is obstructed. The aim of this study was to describe the use of suctioning during newborn resuscitation among survivors versus those who died within 3 days and potential suction-related heart rate responses and associations to newborn characteristics. This was a retrospective observational study from July 2013 to July 2016 in a referral hospital in rural Tanzania. Research assistants observed and documented all deliveries, newborn resuscitations were video-recorded, and newborn heart rates were captured with a dry-electrode electrocardiogram. Liveborn infants ≥34 weeks gestation who received ventilation and with complete datasets were eligible. All 30 newborns who died were included, and a total of 46 survivors were selected as controls. Videos were annotated and heart rate patterns were observed before and after the suction events. Suctioning was performed more frequently than recommended. No differences were found in suctioning characteristics between newborns who died versus those who survived. In 13% of suction events, a significant heart rate change (i.e., arrhythmia or brief/sustained >15% fall in heart rate) was observed in relation to suctioning. This represents a potential additional harm to already depressed newborns undergoing resuscitation.

Indexed as

birth asphyxianeonatal resuscitationnewborn mortalityoro/nasopharyngeal suction

Identifiers

PMID37761501
PMCPMC10529279
OpenAlexW4386686305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.