Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761490›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effect of Ankle-Foot Orthoses in Pediatric Patients with Hereditary Motor-Sensory Neuropathy: A Case Series Study.

Corrado Borghi, Silvia Sassi, Daniela Pandarese, Samuele Messori, Silvia Faccioli

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Corrado BorghiChildren Rehabilitation Unit-UDGEE, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Azienda USL, IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Silvia SassiChildren Rehabilitation Unit-UDGEE, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Azienda USL, IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Daniela PandareseChildren Rehabilitation Unit-UDGEE, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Azienda USL, IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5578-4998
Samuele MessoriChildren Rehabilitation Unit-UDGEE, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Azienda USL, IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Silvia FaccioliChildren Rehabilitation Unit-UDGEE, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Azienda USL, IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Santa Maria Nuova Hospital · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Aims: to evaluate the effect on gait performance and standing stability of ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) in pediatric patients with hereditary motor-sensory neuropathy (HMSN). (2) Methods: a retrospective case-series study including three adolescents (S1, S2, S3, mean age 14 years) with HMSN. The subjects were evaluated barefoot, with carbon AFO (Botter) and with solid AFO (SAFO) by means of: gait analysis, stabilometry and gait functional tests (10 Meter Walk Test, 2 Minute Walk Test). Finally, the CSD-OPUS questionnaire was administered to the assess satisfaction and impact of the orthoses on life quality. (3) Results: orthoses improved gait and stability performance. Botter allowed greater ankle movement than SAFO and provided greater push-off power. This, combined with the carbon elastic energy return, might explain better performances in the 2MWT, with a larger distance traveled compared to SAFO for both S1 (110 m vs. 72 m) and S2 (170 m vs. 155 m) and, compared to barefoot walking, also for S3 (211 m vs. 160 m), for which SAFO analysis was not available. Both orthoses improved performance at the stabilometric analysis. The CSD-OPUS questionnaire showed a significantly higher level of satisfaction with Botter for the subjects (S1, S2) who completed the comparison. (4) Conclusions: Both orthoses improved gait and standing, though Botter proved to be better tolerated and more effective in improving gait endurance.

Indexed as

Gait AnalysisHereditary Sensory And Motor NeuropathyOrthotic DevicesPostural BalanceRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37761490
PMCPMC10529230
OpenAlexW4386608070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.