Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761383›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Machine Learning Algorithm Predicts Mortality Risk in Intensive Care Unit for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

Kuan-Chi Tu, Eric Nyam Tee Tau, Nai-Ching Chen, Ming-Chuan Chang, Tzu-Chieh Yu, Che-Chuan Wang, Chung-Feng Liu, Ching-Lung Kuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kuan-Chi TuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710402, Taiwan.
Eric Nyam Tee TauDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710402, Taiwan.
Nai-Ching ChenDepartment of Nursing, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8534-8705
Ming-Chuan ChangDepartment of Nursing, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710402, Taiwan.
Tzu-Chieh YuDepartment of Nursing, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710402, Taiwan.
Che-Chuan WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710402, Taiwan.
Chung-Feng LiuDepartment of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6698-0273
Ching-Lung KuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan 710402, Taiwan.

Funding

ChiMei Medical center CMFHR 11034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous mortality prediction tools are currently available to assist patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, an algorithm that utilizes various machine learning methods and employs diverse combinations of features to identify the most suitable predicting outcomes of brain injury patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) has not yet been well-established.

methodBetween January 2016 and December 2021, we retrospectively collected data from the electronic medical records of Chi Mei Medical Center, comprising 2260 TBI patients admitted to the ICU. A total of 42 features were incorporated into the analysis using four different machine learning models, which were then segmented into various feature combinations. The predictive performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and validated using the Delong test.

resultThe AUC for each model under different feature combinations ranged from 0.877 (logistic regression with 14 features) to 0.921 (random forest with 22 features). The Delong test indicated that the predictive performance of the machine learning models is better than that of traditional tools such as APACHE II and SOFA scores.

conclusionOur machine learning training demonstrated that the predictive accuracy of the LightGBM is better than that of APACHE II and SOFA scores. These features are readily available on the first day of patient admission to the ICU. By integrating this model into the clinical platform, we can offer clinicians an immediate prognosis for the patient, thereby establishing a bridge for educating and communicating with family members.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer-assisted systemintensive care unitmachine learningmortalitytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID37761383
PMCPMC10528289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.