Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761342›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Nerve Root Compression Analysis to Find Lumbar Spine Stenosis on MRI Using CNN.

Turrnum Shahzadi, Muhammad Usman Ali, Fiaz Majeed, Muhammad Usman Sana, Raquel Martínez Diaz, Md Abdus Samad, Imran Ashraf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Detection from Sagittal and Axial MR Images using Hybrid of Deep Kronecker Network and SpinalNet.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Turrnum ShahzadiDepartment of Information Technology, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan.
Muhammad Usman AliDepartment of Computer Science, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan.
Fiaz MajeedDepartment of Information Technology, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan.
Muhammad Usman SanaDepartment of Information Technology, University of Gujrat, Gujrat 50700, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3768-0989
Raquel Martínez DiazUniversidad Europea del Atlántico, Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0775-9437
Md Abdus SamadDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1990-6924
Imran AshrafDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8271-6496
Information Technology University · PKYeungnam University · KRIbero American University · MXUniversity of Gujrat · PK

Funding

the European University of Atlantic N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lumbar spine stenosis (LSS) is caused by low back pain that exerts pressure on the nerves in the spine. Detecting LSS is a significantly important yet difficult task. It is detected by analyzing the area of the anteroposterior diameter of the patient's lumbar spine. Currently, the versatility and accuracy of LSS segmentation algorithms are limited. The objective of this research is to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to automatically categorize LSS. This study presents a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method to detect LSS using MRI images. Radiological grading is performed on a publicly available dataset. Four regions of interest (ROIs) are determined to diagnose LSS with normal, mild, moderate, and severe gradings. The experiments are performed on 1545 axial-view MRI images. Furthermore, two datasets-multi-ROI and single-ROI-are created. For training and testing, an 80:20 ratio of randomly selected labeled datasets is used, with fivefold cross-validation. The results of the proposed model reveal a 97.01% accuracy for multi-ROI and 97.71% accuracy for single-ROI. The proposed computer-aided diagnosis approach can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy in everyday clinical workflows to assist medical experts in decision making. The proposed CNN-based MRI image segmentation approach shows its efficacy on a variety of datasets. Results are compared to existing state-of-the-art studies, indicating the superior performance of the proposed approach.

Indexed as

deep learningimage processinglumbar spine stenosismagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID37761342
PMCPMC10529899
OpenAlexW4386835975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.