Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761292›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Breast Cancer Classification Using Synthesized Deep Learning Model with Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithm.

Selvakumar Thirumalaisamy, Kamaleshwar Thangavilou, Hariharan Rajadurai, Oumaima Saidani, Nazik Alturki, Sandeep Kumar Mathivanan, Prabhu Jayagopal, Saikat Gochhait

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Selvakumar ThirumalaisamyDepartment of Artificial intelligence & Data Science, Dr. Mahalingam College of Engineering and Technology, Pollachi 642003, India.ORCID 0009-0009-3720-0536
Kamaleshwar ThangavilouDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600062, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4612-1046
Hariharan RajaduraiSchool of Computing Science and Engineering, VIT Bhopal University, Bhopal-Indore Highway Kothrikalan, Sehore 466114, India.
Oumaima SaidaniDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9520-3174
Nazik AlturkiDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Sandeep Kumar MathivananSchool of Computing Science & Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 203201, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8572-1197
Prabhu JayagopalSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3335-6911
Saikat GochhaitSymbiosis Institute of Digital and Telecom Management, Constituent of Symbiosis International Deemed University, Pune 412115, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4583-9208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of mortality among women. Early and accurate detection plays a crucial role in lowering its mortality rate. Timely detection and classification of breast cancer enable the most effective treatment. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have significantly improved the accuracy of tumor detection and classification in medical imaging compared to traditional methods. This study proposes a comprehensive classification technique for identifying breast cancer, utilizing a synthesized CNN, an enhanced optimization algorithm, and transfer learning. The primary goal is to assist radiologists in rapidly identifying anomalies. To overcome inherent limitations, we modified the Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) technique with opposition-based learning (OBL). The Enhanced Ant Colony Optimization (EACO) methodology was then employed to determine the optimal hyperparameter values for the CNN architecture. Our proposed framework combines the Residual Network-101 (ResNet101) CNN architecture with the EACO algorithm, resulting in a new model dubbed EACO-ResNet101. Experimental analysis was conducted on the MIAS and DDSM (CBIS-DDSM) mammographic datasets. Compared to conventional methods, our proposed model achieved an impressive accuracy of 98.63%, sensitivity of 98.76%, and specificity of 98.89% on the CBIS-DDSM dataset. On the MIAS dataset, the proposed model achieved a classification accuracy of 99.15%, a sensitivity of 97.86%, and a specificity of 98.88%. These results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed EACO-ResNet101 over current methodologies.

Indexed as

Ant Colony Optimizationbreast cancerconvolutional neural networkhyperparametersResNet101transfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37761292
PMCPMC10528264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.