Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761224›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Studies on the Enhancement of Sparkling Wine and Chocolate Pairing through Compositional Profile Analysis.

Camelia Elena Luchian, Elena Cristina Scutarașu, Lucia Cintia Colibaba, Dragoș Grosaru, Valeriu V Cotea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camelia Elena LuchianFaculty of Horticulture, Iași University of Life Sciences, 3rd M. Sadoveanu Alley, 700490 Iași, Romania.
Elena Cristina ScutarașuFaculty of Horticulture, Iași University of Life Sciences, 3rd M. Sadoveanu Alley, 700490 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3424-1019
Lucia Cintia ColibabaFaculty of Horticulture, Iași University of Life Sciences, 3rd M. Sadoveanu Alley, 700490 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1634-8154
Dragoș GrosaruFaculty of Horticulture, Iași University of Life Sciences, 3rd M. Sadoveanu Alley, 700490 Iași, Romania.
Valeriu V CoteaFaculty of Horticulture, Iași University of Life Sciences, 3rd M. Sadoveanu Alley, 700490 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8717-6217

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumers are looking to experience as many interesting culinary combinations as possible, and there is a growing tendency to associate wine with various foods. Although there are some studies associating wine with chocolate, especially red wine, no articles have been published referring to sparkling wines. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to identify the taste compatibility and sensory synergies between sparkling wine and chocolate, with a focus on identifying combinations that can enhance the tasting experience. For this experiment, 14 variants of sparkling wines obtained in Romania and 5 chocolate assortments were evaluated to identify the best culinary match. White chocolate fitted better with Chardonnay-demi-dry sparkling wine; ruby chocolate presented a good match with Fetească neagră-demi-dry; milk chocolate with 32% cocoa powder associated better with Tămâioasă românească-sweet; and dark chocolate with 70% and 95% cocoa powder had synergic matches with Fetească neagră-sweet. Wine attributes like sweetness, acidity, alcoholic strength and chocolate composition significantly impacted the level of match.

Indexed as

chocolatefood and beverage pairingsensory analysissparkling winessynergic match

Identifiers

PMID37761224
PMCPMC10529128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.