Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761095›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Based Feature Representations for Molecular Taste Prediction.

Yu Song, Sihao Chang, Jing Tian, Weihua Pan, Lu Feng, Hongchao Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PharmaGNN: a model for odor prediction based on graph neural networks.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yu SongZhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, School of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Sihao ChangShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Jing TianShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Weihua PanShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518120, China.
Lu FengZhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, School of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Hongchao JiShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Shenzhen 518120, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7364-0741

Funding

Shenzhen Science and Technology Program RCBS20210609103157070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taste determination in small molecules is critical in food chemistry but traditional experimental methods can be time-consuming. Consequently, computational techniques have emerged as valuable tools for this task. In this study, we explore taste prediction using various molecular feature representations and assess the performance of different machine learning algorithms on a dataset comprising 2601 molecules. The results reveal that GNN-based models outperform other approaches in taste prediction. Moreover, consensus models that combine diverse molecular representations demonstrate improved performance. Among these, the molecular fingerprints + GNN consensus model emerges as the top performer, highlighting the complementary strengths of GNNs and molecular fingerprints. These findings have significant implications for food chemistry research and related fields. By leveraging these computational approaches, taste prediction can be expedited, leading to advancements in understanding the relationship between molecular structure and taste perception in various food components and related compounds.

Indexed as

cheminformaticsdeep learningmachine learningmolecular feature representationtaste prediction

Identifiers

PMID37761095
PMCPMC10529232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.