Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37760905›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Gender-Specific Interactions in a Visual Object Recognition Task in Persons with Opioid Use Disorder.

JoAnn Petrie, Logan R Kowallis, Sarah Kamhout, Kyle B Bills, Daniel Adams, Donovan E Fleming, Bruce L Brown, Scott C Steffensen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07748715 (Blue Color Processing in the Eye as a Biomarker of Brain Dopamine), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07748715 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Blue Color Processing in the Eye as a Biomarker of Brain Dopamine

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of South FloridaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsParkinson Disease, Healthy Adult ParticipantsArmsLevadopa/Carbidopa eyedrops, Sham, Levodopa/Carbidopa (Sinemet)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

JoAnn PetrieDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Logan R KowallisDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8234-0409
Sarah KamhoutDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Kyle B BillsDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Daniel AdamsPhotoPharmics, Inc., 947 So, 500 E, Suite 100, American Fork, UT 84003, USA.
Donovan E FlemingDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Bruce L BrownDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Scott C SteffensenDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6463-8861
Brigham Young University · US

Funding

Amelioration of opioid withdrawal-induced anxiety and craving with heterodyned whole body vibrationR41DA053083 · NIDA · PHOTOPHARMICS, INC. · PI ADAMS, DANIEL NATHAN, STEFFENSEN, SCOTT C · 2021 to 2021
$320k
Amelioration of opioid use disorder with heterodyned whole body vibrationR42DA060644 · NIDA · PHOTOPHARMICS, INC. · PI ADAMS, DANIEL NATHAN, STEFFENSEN, SCOTT C · 2024 to 2024
$319k
NIDA NIH HHS R41 DA053083NIDA NIH HHS R42 DA060644NIH HHS DA053083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid use disorder (OUD)-associated overdose deaths have reached epidemic proportions worldwide over the past two decades, with death rates for men reported at twice the rate for women. Using a controlled, cross-sectional, age-matched (18-56 y) design to better understand the cognitive neuroscience of OUD, we evaluated the electroencephalographic (EEG) responses of male and female participants with OUD vs. age- and gender-matched non-OUD controls during a simple visual object recognition Go/No-Go task. Overall, women had significantly slower reaction times (RTs) than men. In addition, EEG N200 and P300 event-related potential (ERP) amplitudes for non-OUD controls were significantly larger for men, while their latencies were significantly shorter than for women. However, while N200 and P300 amplitudes were not significantly affected by OUD for either men or women in this task, latencies were also affected differentially in men vs. women with OUD. Accordingly, for both N200 and P300, male OUD participants exhibited longer latencies while female OUD participants exhibited shorter ones than in non-OUD controls. Additionally, robust oscillations were found in all participants during a feedback message associated with performance in the task. Although alpha and beta power during the feedback message were significantly greater for men than women overall, both alpha and beta oscillations exhibited significantly lower power in all participants with OUD. Taken together, these findings suggest important gender by OUD differences in cognitive processing and reflection of performance in this simple visual task.

Indexed as

alpha and beta brain oscillationselectroencephalogram (EEG)event-related potentials (ERP)gender-specific differencesopioid use disorder (OUD)substance use disorder (SUD)visual attentionvisual cognitive processingvisual evoked potential (VEP)

Identifiers

PMID37760905
PMCPMC10525754
OpenAlexW4386461692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.