Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37760560›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Comparing Predicted Toxicities between Hypofractionated Proton and Photon Radiotherapy of Liver Cancer Patients with Different Adaptive Schemes.

Lena Nenoff, Atchar Sudhyadhom, Jackson Lau, Gregory C Sharp, Harald Paganetti, Jennifer Pursley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lena NenoffHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7468-835X
Atchar SudhyadhomHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Jackson LauHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Gregory C SharpHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Harald PaganettiHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6257-2413
Jennifer PursleyHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0531-6798
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Project 3: Enhanced Sensitivity of Tumors to Proton Beam Therapy: Mechanisms and Biomarkers.P01CA261669 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HONG, THEODORE S · 2021 to 2025
$14.0M
Fast Individualized Delivery Adaptation in Proton TherapyR01CA229178 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PAGANETTI, HARALD · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
A Multimodal Imaging Approach Towards the Reduction of Proton Beam Range UncertaintiesR21EB026086 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SUDHYADHOM, ATCHAR · 2018 to 2020
$594k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA261669NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229178NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB026086Swiss National Science Foundation 199943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the availability of MRI linacs, online adaptive intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has become a treatment option for liver cancer patients, often combined with hypofractionation. Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) has the potential to reduce the dose to healthy tissue, but it is particularly sensitive to changes in the beam path and might therefore benefit from online adaptation. This study compares the normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) for liver and duodenal toxicity for adaptive and non-adaptive IMRT and IMPT treatments of liver cancer patients. Adaptive and non-adaptive IMRT and IMPT plans were optimized to 50 Gy (RBE = 1.1 for IMPT) in five fractions for 10 liver cancer patients, using the original MRI linac images and physician-drawn structures. Three liver NTCP models were used to predict radiation-induced liver disease, an increase in albumin-bilirubin level, and a Child-Pugh score increase of more than 2. Additionally, three duodenal NTCP models were used to predict gastric bleeding, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity with grades >3, and duodenal toxicity grades 2-4. NTCPs were calculated for adaptive and non-adaptive IMRT and IMPT treatments. In general, IMRT showed higher NTCP values than IMPT and the differences were often significant. However, the differences between adaptive and non-adaptive treatment schemes were not significant, indicating that the NTCP benefit of adaptive treatment regimens is expected to be smaller than the expected difference between IMRT and IMPT.

Indexed as

adaptive radiotherapyliver SBRTNTCPproton therapy

Identifiers

PMID37760560
PMCPMC10526201
OpenAlexW4386837782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.