Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37760519›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Bispecific Antibodies in Hematological Malignancies: A Scoping Review.

Mohamed H Omer, Areez Shafqat, Omar Ahmad, Khaled Alkattan, Ahmed Yaqinuddin, Moussab Damlaj

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Preclinical Characterization of CLSP-1025, a First-in-Class, Mutation-Specific T-Cell Engager Targeting a Neoantigen Derived from a Common p53 Mutation.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  2. A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of the Cardiovascular Adverse Effects of Bispecific Antibody Therapy in Hematologic Malignancies.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Induced proximity-based therapeutic modalities.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohamed H OmerSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5967-9984
Areez ShafqatCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1202-7214
Omar AhmadCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia.
Khaled AlkattanCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1372-9883
Ahmed YaqinuddinCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7536-910X
Moussab DamlajDepartment of Hematology & Oncology, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 11001, United Arab Emirates.
Alfaisal University · SACardiff University · GBKhalifa University of Science and Technology · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) and bispecific antibodies (BiAbs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape of hematological malignancies. By directing T cells towards specific tumor antigens, BiTEs and BiAbs facilitate the T-cell-mediated lysis of neoplastic cells. The success of blinatumomab, a CD19xCD3 BiTE, in acute lymphoblastic leukemia spearheaded the expansive development of BiTEs/BiAbs in the context of hematological neoplasms. Nearly a decade later, numerous BiTEs/BiAbs targeting a range of tumor-associated antigens have transpired in the treatment of multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute myelogenous leukemia, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, despite their generally favorable safety profiles, particular toxicities such as infections, cytokine release syndrome, myelosuppression, and neurotoxicity after BiAb/BiTE therapy raise valid concerns. Moreover, target antigen loss and the immunosuppressive microenvironment of hematological neoplasms facilitate resistance towards BiTEs/BiAbs. This review aims to highlight the most recent evidence from clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of BiAbs/BiTEs. Additionally, the review will provide mechanistic insights into the limitations of BiAbs whilst outlining practical applications and strategies to overcome these limitations.

Indexed as

antibodiesbispecific antibodyCAR-Thematological cancerleukemialymphomamultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID37760519
PMCPMC10526328
OpenAlexW4386755094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.