Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37760511›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

A Diagnostic Accuracy Study of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer, including a Model for the Partial Omission of Systematic Biopsies.

Juan Morote, Natàlia Picola, Jesús Muñoz-Rodriguez, Nahuel Paesano, Xavier Ruiz-Plazas, Marta V Muñoz-Rivero, Anna Celma, Gemma García-de Manuel, Ignacio Aisian, Pol Servian and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Juan MoroteDepartment of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Natàlia PicolaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Jesús Muñoz-RodriguezDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, 08208 Sabadell, Spain.
Nahuel PaesanoClínica Creu Blanca, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9278-5543
Xavier Ruiz-PlazasDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, 43005 Tarragona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2135-3860
Marta V Muñoz-RiveroDepartment of Urology, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
Anna CelmaDepartment of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Gemma García-de ManuelDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitari Josep Trueta, 17007 Girona, Spain.
Ignacio AisianDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clinic, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Pol ServianDepartment of Urology, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Spain.
José M AbascalDepartment of Urology, Parc de Salut Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8374-6593

Funding

Instituto de Salut Carlos III (SP) PI20-01666Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital MIA.2021.M02.0005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to analyse the current accuracy of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies in detecting csPCa. A secondary objective was to determine whether there are factors predicting the finding of csPCa in targeted biopsies and, if so, to explore the utility of a predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies. We analysed 2122 men with suspected PCa, serum PSA > 3 ng/mL, and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), who underwent targeted and systematic biopsies between 2021 and 2022. CsPCa (grade group 2 or higher) was detected in 1026 men (48.4%). Discrepancies in csPCa detection in targeted and systematic biopsies were observed in 49.6%, with 13.9% of csPCa cases being detected only in systematic biopsies and 35.7% only in targeted biopsies. A predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies was developed from the independent predictors age (years), prostate volume (mL), PI-RADS score (3 to 5), mpMRI Tesla (1.5 vs. 3.0), TRUS-MRI fusion image technique (cognitive vs. software), and prostate biopsy route (transrectal vs. transperineal). The csPCa discrimination ability of targeted biopsies showed an AUC of 0.741 (95% CI 0.721-0.762). The avoidance rate of systematic prostate biopsies went from 0.5% without missing csPCa to 18.3% missing 4.6% of csPCa cases. We conclude that the csPCa diagnostic accuracy of targeted biopsies is higher than that of systematic biopsies. However, a significant rate of csPCa remains detected only in systematic biopsies. A predictive model for the partial omission of systematic biopsies was developed.

Indexed as

clinically significant prostate cancer detectionprostate biopsy concordancesystematic biopsytargeted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37760511
PMCPMC10526349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.