Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37760505›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

MRI Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models for Ki67 Expression and Gleason Grade Group Prediction in Prostate Cancer.

Xiaofeng Qiao, Xiling Gu, Yunfan Liu, Xin Shu, Guangyong Ai, Shuang Qian, Li Liu, Xiaojing He, Jingjing Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaofeng QiaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.
Xiling GuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.
Yunfan LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.
Xin ShuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.
Guangyong AiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.
Shuang QianBig Data and Software Engineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400000, China.
Li LiuBig Data and Software Engineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4776-5292
Xiaojing HeDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.
Jingjing ZhangDepartments of Diagnostic Radiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119074, Singapore.
Dalian Medical University · CNChongqing University · CNNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Ki67 index and the Gleason grade group (GGG) are vital prognostic indicators of prostate cancer (PCa). This study investigated the value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) radiomics feature-based machine learning (ML) models in predicting the Ki67 index and GGG of PCa.

methodsA total of 122 patients with pathologically proven PCa who had undergone preoperative MRI were retrospectively included. Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Then, recursive feature elimination (RFE) was applied to remove redundant features. ML models for predicting Ki67 expression and GGG were constructed based on bpMRI and different algorithms, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN). The performances of different models were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. In addition, a joint analysis of Ki67 expression and GGG was performed by assessing their Spearman correlation and calculating the diagnostic accuracy for both indices.

resultsThe ML model based on LR and ADC + T2 (LR_ADC + T2, AUC = 0.8882) performed best in predicting Ki67 expression, and ADC_wavelet-LHH_firstorder_Maximum had the highest feature weighting. The SVM_DWI + T2 (AUC = 0.9248) performed best in predicting GGG, and DWI_wavelet HLL_glcm_SumAverage had the highest feature weighting. The Ki67 and GGG exhibited a weak positive correlation (

conclusionThe proposed ML models are suitable for predicting both Ki67 expression and GGG in PCa. This algorithm could be used to identify indolent or invasive PCa with a noninvasive, repeatable, and accurate diagnostic method.

Indexed as

Gleason grade groupKi67machine learningMRIprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID37760505
PMCPMC10526397
OpenAlexW4386715618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.