Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37760259›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2023

Nociception in Chicken Embryos, Part III: Analysis of Movements before and after Application of a Noxious Stimulus.

Stephanie C Süß, Julia Werner, Anna M Saller, Larissa Weiss, Judith Reiser, Janie M Ondracek, Yury Zablotski, Sandra Kollmansperger, Malte Anders, Heidrun Potschka and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The avian embryo as a time-honoured animal model in developmental, biomedical and agricultural research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie C SüßCenter for Preclinical Research, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-4201-8476
Julia WernerCenter for Preclinical Research, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4374-5374
Anna M SallerCenter for Preclinical Research, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5724-5701
Larissa WeissCenter for Preclinical Research, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-6928-3034
Judith ReiserCenter for Preclinical Research, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-3351-5268
Janie M OndracekChair of Zoology, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4570-447X
Yury ZablotskiClinic for Swine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6928-4089
Sandra KollmanspergerClinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-2216-3659
Malte AndersClinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3059-7832
Heidrun PotschkaInstitute of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80539 Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1506-0252
Benjamin SchusserReproductive Biotechnology, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9990-1890
Thomas FenzlClinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0132-9591
Christine BaumgartnerCenter for Preclinical Research, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6133-5099
Technical University of Munich · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Federal Office for Agriculture and Food 2821HS005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many potentially noxious interventions are performed on chicken embryos in research and in the poultry industry. It is therefore essential and in the interest of animal welfare to be able to precisely define the point at which a chicken embryo is capable of nociception in ovo. The present part III of a comprehensive study examined the movements of developing chicken embryos with the aim of identifying behavioral responses to a noxious stimulus. For this purpose, a noxious mechanical stimulus and a control stimulus were applied in a randomized order. The recorded movements of the embryos were evaluated using the markerless pose estimation software DeepLabCut and manual observations. After the application of the mechanical stimulus, a significant increase in beak movement was identified in 15- to 18-day-old embryos. In younger embryos, no behavioral changes related to the noxious stimulus were observed. The presented results indicate that noxious mechanical stimuli at the beak base evoke a nocifensive reaction in chicken embryos starting at embryonic day 15.

Indexed as

behaviorchicken embryodevelopmentGallus gallus domesticusmovementnociceptionpain

Identifiers

PMID37760259
PMCPMC10525827
OpenAlexW4386601729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.