Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37760112›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Nano-Biofertilizer Formulations for Agriculture: A Systematic Review on Recent Advances and Prospective Applications.

Diksha Garg, Kandi Sridhar, Baskaran Stephen Inbaraj, Prince Chawla, Manikant Tripathi, Minaxi Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Harnessing Silicon and Nanosilicon Formulations withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Enhanced chickpea (Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Diksha GargDepartment of Microbiology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5324-6878
Kandi SridharDepartment of Food Technology, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education (Deemed to be University), Coimbatore 641021, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6174-0024
Baskaran Stephen InbarajDepartment of Food Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4301-7614
Prince ChawlaDepartment of Food Technology and Nutrition, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2383-7925
Manikant TripathiBiotechnology Program, Dr. Rammanohar Lohia Avadh University, Ayodhya 224001, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2020-8709
Minaxi SharmaCARAH ASBL, Rue Paul Pastur, 11, 7800 Ath, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6493-5217
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University · INFu Jen Catholic University · TWKarpagam Academy of Higher Education · INLovely Professional University · INPunjab Agricultural University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the twenty-first century, nanotechnology has emerged as a potentially game-changing innovation. Essential minerals are mostly unavailable in modern cropping systems without the application of synthetic fertilizers, which have a serious negative impact on the ecosystem. This review focuses on the coupling of nanoparticles with biofertilizers to function as nano-biofertilizers (NBFs), which may ensure world food security in the face of the rising population. The inoculation of plants with NBFs improves plant development and resistance to stress. Metallic nanoparticles as well as organic components comprising polysaccharide and chitosan may be encapsulated, utilizing microbe-based green synthesis to make NBFs, which circumvents the limitations of conventional chemical fertilizers. The application of NBFs is just getting started, and shows more promise than other approaches for changing conventional farming into high-tech "smart" farming. This study used bibliographic analysis using Web of Science to find relevant papers on "nano biofertilizers", "plants", and "agriculture". These subjects have received a lot of attention in the literature, as shown by the co-citation patterns of these publications. The novel use of nanotechnology in agriculture is explored in this research work, which makes use of the unique characteristics of nanoscale materials to address urgent concerns including nutrient delivery, crop protection, and sustainable farming methods. This study attempts to fill in some of the gaps in our knowledge by discussing the formulation, fabrication, and characterization of NBFs, as well as elucidating the mechanisms by which NBFs interact with plants and how this benefits the ability of the plant to withstand biotic and abiotic stress brought about by climate change. This review also addresses recent developments and future directions in farming using NBF formulations in the field.

Indexed as

chitosanencapsulationmicroorganismnano-biofertilizer formulationsplant growth promotionpolysaccharidesmart farming

Identifiers

PMID37760112
PMCPMC10525541
OpenAlexW4386161244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.