ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Translating pharmacogenomic sequencing data into drug response predictions-How to interpret variants of unknown significance.
Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational variant predictors for pharmacogenomics: from evaluation of single alleles to assessment of adverse drug reactions to antidepressants.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Article
- Higher risk of gastrointestinal stenosis and obstruction in clozapine-treated individuals with schizophrenia: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Opportunities and Challenges of Population Pharmacogenomics.Annals of human genetics · 2025Review
- Translating pharmacogenomic sequencing data into drug response predictions-How to interpret variants of unknown significance.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Review
- The history and future of pharmacogenetics in Aotearoa/New Zealand.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Review
- Comparative evaluation of Oxford Nanopore Technologies' adaptive sampling and the Twist long-read PGx panel for pharmacogenomic profiling.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Pharmacogenetic analysis of structural variation in the 1000 genomes project using whole genome sequences.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence, medications, pharmacogenomics, and ethics.Pharmacogenomics · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Revealed CFTR Associated with Therapy Outcome of Breast Cancer: A Feasibility Study.Oncology · 2024Article
- Machine learning models for pharmacogenomic variant effect predictions - recent developments and future frontiers.PharmacogenomicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid development of sequencing technologies during the past 20 years has provided a variety of methods and tools to interrogate human genomic variations at the population level. Pharmacogenes are well known to be highly polymorphic and a plethora of pharmacogenomic variants has been identified in population sequencing data. However, so far only a small number of these variants have been functionally characterized regarding their impact on drug efficacy and toxicity and the significance of the vast majority remains unknown. It is therefore of high importance to develop tools and frameworks to accurately infer the effects of pharmacogenomic variants and, eventually, aggregate the effect of individual variations into personalized drug response predictions. To address this challenge, we here first describe the technological advances, including sequencing methods and accompanying bioinformatic processing pipelines that have enabled reliable variant identification. Subsequently, we highlight advances in computational algorithms for pharmacogenomic variant interpretation and discuss the added value of emerging strategies, such as machine learning and the integrative use of omics techniques that have the potential to further contribute to the refinement of personalized pharmacological response predictions. Lastly, we provide an overview of experimental and clinical approaches to validate in silico predictions. We conclude that the iterative feedback between computational predictions and experimental validations is likely to rapidly improve the accuracy of pharmacogenomic prediction models, which might soon allow for an incorporation of the entire pharmacogenetic profile into personalized response predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.