Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37759374›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Translating pharmacogenomic sequencing data into drug response predictions-How to interpret variants of unknown significance.

Roman Tremmel, Sebastian Pirmann, Yitian Zhou, Volker M Lauschke

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The history and future of pharmacogenetics in Aotearoa/New Zealand.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Roman TremmelDr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.
Sebastian PirmannComputational Oncology Group, Molecular Precision Oncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Yitian ZhouDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Volker M LauschkeDr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1140-6204
Karolinska Institutet · SEDr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 390727645Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 390900677German Cancer Research CenterRobert Bosch Center for Tumor DiseasesRobert Bosch Stiftung
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of sequencing technologies during the past 20 years has provided a variety of methods and tools to interrogate human genomic variations at the population level. Pharmacogenes are well known to be highly polymorphic and a plethora of pharmacogenomic variants has been identified in population sequencing data. However, so far only a small number of these variants have been functionally characterized regarding their impact on drug efficacy and toxicity and the significance of the vast majority remains unknown. It is therefore of high importance to develop tools and frameworks to accurately infer the effects of pharmacogenomic variants and, eventually, aggregate the effect of individual variations into personalized drug response predictions. To address this challenge, we here first describe the technological advances, including sequencing methods and accompanying bioinformatic processing pipelines that have enabled reliable variant identification. Subsequently, we highlight advances in computational algorithms for pharmacogenomic variant interpretation and discuss the added value of emerging strategies, such as machine learning and the integrative use of omics techniques that have the potential to further contribute to the refinement of personalized pharmacological response predictions. Lastly, we provide an overview of experimental and clinical approaches to validate in silico predictions. We conclude that the iterative feedback between computational predictions and experimental validations is likely to rapidly improve the accuracy of pharmacogenomic prediction models, which might soon allow for an incorporation of the entire pharmacogenetic profile into personalized response predictions.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic VariantsPrecision MedicineAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMachine Learningartificial intelligenceelectronic health recordspopulation‐scale sequencingprecision medicinevariant effect predictions

Identifiers

PMID37759374
PMCPMC11773106
OpenAlexW4387115524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.