Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37759277›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2023

Malaria vaccine coverage estimation using age-eligible populations and service user denominators in Kenya.

Angela K Moturi, Rose Jalang'o, Anitah Cherono, Samuel K Muchiri, Robert W Snow, Emelda A Okiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angela K MoturiPopulation & Health Impact Surveillance Group, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. amoturi@kemri-wellcome.org.
Rose Jalang'oNational Vaccines & Immunization Programme, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
Anitah CheronoPopulation & Health Impact Surveillance Group, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Samuel K MuchiriPopulation & Health Impact Surveillance Group, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Robert W SnowPopulation & Health Impact Surveillance Group, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Emelda A OkiroPopulation & Health Impact Surveillance Group, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203077Wellcome Trust 212176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization approved the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine for wider rollout, and Kenya participated in a phased pilot implementation from 2019 to understand its impact under routine conditions. Vaccine delivery requires coverage measures at national and sub-national levels to evaluate progress over time. This study aimed to estimate the coverage of the RTS,S/AS01 vaccine during the first 36 months of the Kenyan pilot implementation.

methodsMonthly dose-specific immunization data for 23 sub-counties were obtained from routine health information systems at the facility level for 2019-2022. Coverage of each RTS,S/AS01 dose was determined using reported doses as a numerator and service-based (Penta 1 and Measles) or population (projected infant populations from WorldPop) as denominators. Descriptive statistics of vaccine delivery, dropout rates and coverage estimates were computed across the 36-month implementation period.

resultsOver 36 months, 818,648 RTSS/AS01 doses were administered. Facilities managed by the Ministry of Health and faith-based organizations accounted for over 88% of all vaccines delivered. Overall, service-based malaria vaccine coverage was 96%, 87%, 78%, and 39% for doses 1-4 respectively. Using a population-derived denominator for age-eligible children, vaccine coverage was 78%, 68%, 57%, and 24% for doses 1-4, respectively. Of the children that received measles dose 1 vaccines delivered at 9 months (coverage: 95%), 82% received RTSS/AS01 dose 3, only 66% of children who received measles dose 2 at 18 months (coverage: 59%) also received dose 4.

conclusionThe implementation programme successfully maintained high levels of coverage for the first three doses of RTSS/AS01 among children defined as EPI service users up to 9 months of age but had much lower coverage within the community with up to 1 in 5 children not receiving the vaccine. Consistent with vaccines delivered over the age of 1 year, coverage of the fourth malaria dose was low. Vaccine uptake, service access and dropout rates for malaria vaccines require constant monitoring and intervention to ensure maximum protection is conferred.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsMalaria VaccinesMeaslesBiological TransportChildHumansInfantKenyaMalaria VaccinesKenyaMalariaMalaria vaccine pilotRTS,S/AS01Vaccine coverage

Identifiers

PMID37759277
PMCPMC10523632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.