ArticleBMC medical research methodology2023
Analytical methods for identifying sequences of utilization in health data: a scoping review.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Overview of the Last 71 Years of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Content Analysis and Meta-analysis to Investigate the Topic and Scientific Evolution.Obesity surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Medical code embeddings from claims-based co-occurrences: a unified semantic space for ICD-10 diagnoses and ATC medications.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Patterns in health service use during and up to 1 year after an acute episode of hospital-presenting self-harm: data linkage cohort study of over 1.3 million records.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- Clustering methods for categorical time series and sequences : a scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- A methodology for developing dermatological datasets: lessons from retrospective data collection for AI-based applications.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Palliative care pathways in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): a sequence analysis of health claims data.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Sequence Analysis to Phenotype Health Care Patterns in Adults With Musculoskeletal Conditions Using Primary Care Electronic Health Records.Arthritis care & research · 2025Article
- Exploring patterns in pediatric type 1 diabetes care and the impact of socioeconomic status.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring heterogeneity in coxarthrosis medication use patterns before total hip replacement: a State Sequence Analysis.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Improving community health centres with big data analytics: A systematic literature review on adoption.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare, as with other sectors, has undergone progressive digitalization, generating an ever-increasing wealth of data that enables research and the analysis of patient movement. This can help to evaluate treatment processes and outcomes, and in turn improve the quality of care. This scoping review provides an overview of the algorithms and methods that have been used to identify care pathways from healthcare utilization data.
methodThis review was conducted according to the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. The PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EconLit databases were searched and studies published in English between 2000 and 2021 considered. The search strategy used keywords divided into three categories: the method of data analysis, the requirement profile for the data, and the intended presentation of results. Criteria for inclusion were that health data were analyzed, the methodology used was described and that the chronology of care events was considered. In a two-stage review process, records were reviewed by two researchers independently for inclusion. Results were synthesized narratively.
resultsThe literature search yielded 2,865 entries; 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. Health data from different countries ([Formula: see text]) and of different types of disease ([Formula: see text]) were analyzed with respect to different care events. Applied methods can be divided into those identifying subsequences of care and those describing full care trajectories. Variants of pattern mining or Markov models were mostly used to extract subsequences, with clustering often applied to find care trajectories. Statistical algorithms such as rule mining, probability-based machine learning algorithms or a combination of methods were also applied. Clustering methods were sometimes used for data preparation or result compression. Further characteristics of the included studies are presented.
conclusionVarious data mining methods are already being applied to gain insight from health data. The great heterogeneity of the methods used shows the need for a scoping review. We performed a narrative review and found that clustering methods currently dominate the literature for identifying complete care trajectories, while variants of pattern mining dominate for identifying subsequences of limited length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.