Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37759158›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

Automatic echocardiographic anomalies interpretation using a stacked residual-dense network model.

Siti Nurmaini, Ade Iriani Sapitri, Bambang Tutuko, Muhammad Naufal Rachmatullah, Dian Palupi Rini, Annisa Darmawahyuni, Firdaus Firdaus, Satria Mandala, Ria Nova, Nuswil Bernolian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging applications of artificial intelligence for obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siti NurmainiIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, 30139, Indonesia. siti_nurmaini@unsri.ac.id.
Ade Iriani SapitriIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, 30139, Indonesia.
Bambang TutukoIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, 30139, Indonesia.
Muhammad Naufal RachmatullahIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, 30139, Indonesia.
Dian Palupi RiniDepartment of Informatic Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia.
Annisa DarmawahyuniIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, 30139, Indonesia.
Firdaus FirdausIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, 30139, Indonesia.
Satria MandalaHuman Centric Engineering, School of Computing, Telkom University, Bandung, Indonesia.
Ria NovaDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Child Health, Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, Indonesia.
Nuswil BernolianDivision of Fetomaternal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang, Indonesia.
Sriwijaya University · IDTelkom University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Echocardiographic interpretation during the prenatal or postnatal period is important for diagnosing cardiac septal abnormalities. However, manual interpretation can be time consuming and subject to human error. Automatic segmentation of echocardiogram can support cardiologists in making an initial interpretation. However, such a process does not always provide straightforward information to make a complete interpretation. The segmentation process only identifies the region of cardiac septal abnormality, whereas complete interpretation should determine based on the position of defect. In this study, we proposed a stacked residual-dense network model to segment the entire region of cardiac and classifying their defect positions to generate automatic echocardiographic interpretation. We proposed the generalization model with incorporated two modalities: prenatal and postnatal echocardiography. To further evaluate the effectiveness of our model, its performance was verified by five cardiologists. We develop a pipeline process using 1345 echocardiograms for training data and 181 echocardiograms for unseen data from prospective patients acquired during standard clinical practice at Muhammad Hoesin General Hospital in Indonesia. As a result, the proposed model produced of 58.17% intersection over union (IoU), 75.75% dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and 76.36% mean average precision (mAP) for the validation data. Using unseen data, we achieved 42.39% IoU, 55.72% DSC, and 51.04% mAP. Further, the classification of defect positions using unseen data had approximately 92.27% accuracy, 94.33% specificity, and 92.05% sensitivity. Finally, our proposed model is validated with human expert with varying Kappa value. On average, these results hold promise of increasing suitability in clinical practice as a supporting diagnostic tool for establishing the diagnosis.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyHeartFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesCardiac septal defectClassificationDeep learningEchocardiographySegmentation

Identifiers

PMID37759158
PMCPMC10536702
OpenAlexW4387091717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.