Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37758934›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

Patient compliance for metabolic evaluation and medical treatment (CoMET) in calcium-oxalate stone patients: prospective study by EULIS eCORE study group.

Mehmet İlker Gökce, Selçuk Güven, Kremena Petkova, Tzevat Tefik, Muhammed Arif İbiş, Giray Sönmez, Nariman Gadzhiev, Murat Can Kiremit, Mehmet Ali Karagöz, Luca Villa and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Mehmet İlker GökceDepartment of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Sancak Mahallesi Turan Güneş Bulvarı, 39/23, Çankaya, 06550, Ankara, Turkey. migokce@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2370-548X
Selçuk GüvenDepartment of Urology, NEÜ Meram Medicine Faculty, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-8435
Kremena PetkovaDepartment of Urology and Nephrology, Military Medical Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Tzevat TefikDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-8332
Muhammed Arif İbişDepartment of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Sancak Mahallesi Turan Güneş Bulvarı, 39/23, Çankaya, 06550, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-2101
Giray SönmezDepartment of Urology, NEÜ Meram Medicine Faculty, Konya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4615-7348
Nariman GadzhievDepartment of Urology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6255-0193
Murat Can KiremitDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6676-9205
Mehmet Ali KaragözDepartment of Urology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu City Hospital Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0144-2041
Luca VillaDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Kemal SarıcaDepartment of Urology, Biruni University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2473-1313
Ankara University · TRBiruni University · TRÇankaya University · TRFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg · RUIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITIstanbul University · TRKoç University · TRMilitary Medical Academy · BGMinistry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we aimed to identify the compliance rates of calcium-oxalate stone patients for metabolic evaluation, diet and medical treatment and also determine the factors that are associated with poor compliance rates.

methodsThis study was conducted by the EULIS eCORE working group prospectively. In the initial visit, demographic and stone-related characteristics were recorded. Patients were suggested metabolic evaluation, dietary advices and medical treatment. Follow-up visit was performed after 3 months and compliance rates were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with poor compliance to metabolic evaluation, diet and medical treatment.

resultsData of 346 patients from nine centers were analyzed. Compliance rates were 71.7%, 65.3%, and 63.7% for metabolic evaluation, diet, and medical treatment, respectively. In multivariate analysis, level of education (p = 0.003), history of emergency department visit (p = 0.04), number of stone surgeries (p = 0.03), patient care in dedicated stone clinic (p = 0.03), and history of shock wave lithotripsy (p = 0.005) were detected as independent predictors of compliance to metabolic analysis. Level of education (p < 0.001) and history of emergency department visit (p = 0.01) were detected as independent predictors of patient compliance to diet. Number of stone episodes (p = 0.03), family history of stones (p = 0.02), and polypharmacy (p < 0.001) were detected as independent predictors of patient compliance to medical treatment.

conclusionsPatient compliance to metabolic evaluation, diet, and medical therapy is important for successful management of urolithiasis. Dietary advices and medications should be personalized by taking in to account the factors associated with poor compliance.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiUrolithiasisCalciumCalcium OxalateHumansPatient ComplianceProspective StudiesCalciumCalcium OxalateAdherence to dietAdherence to medicationMetabolic evaluationPreventive pharmacotherapyUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID37758934
OpenAlexW4387115230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.