Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37758838›Full record

SynthesisInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2023

Organizational interventions and occupational burnout: a meta-analysis with focus on exhaustion.

Isabelle Bes, Yara Shoman, Muaamar Al-Gobari, Valentin Rousson, Irina Guseva Canu

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
20.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Validity Evidence for the Secondary Symptoms of the Burnout Assessment Tool: A Brazilian Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabelle BesDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Center for Primary Cary and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Epalinges, Switzerland.
Yara ShomanDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Center for Primary Cary and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Epalinges, Switzerland.
Muaamar Al-GobariDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Center for Primary Cary and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Epalinges, Switzerland.
Valentin RoussonQuantitative Research Secteur, Unisanté, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Irina Guseva CanuDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Center for Primary Cary and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Epalinges, Switzerland. irina.guseva-canu@unisante.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-8421
Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess whether organizational interventions are effective to prevent or reduce exhaustion, the core dimension of occupational burnout.

methodsWe searched in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases randomized and non-randomized controlled trials conducted among active workers and reporting the outcome as exhaustion score. We calculated the effect sizes using the pre-test-post-test control group design's estimate. We used the random effects model in meta-analysis and Cochrane collaboration's tool for interventions to assess the risk of bias. Overall quality of evidence was appraised using the GRADE.

resultsFrom the 2425 identified records, we assessed 228 full texts for eligibility and included 11 original articles describing 13 studies, 11 on organizational interventions, and 2 on combined inventions. The interventions were participatory (n = 9), focused on workload (n = 2), or on work schedule (n = 2). The overall effect size was - 0.30 ((95% CI = - 0.42; - 0.18), I

conclusionInterventions at combined level in workplaces could be helpful in preventing exhaustion. However, the evidence is still limited, due to a high heterogeneity between studies, bias potential, and small number of eligible studies. This calls for further research, using workload interventions at organizational level, especially in sectors with high risk of job stress and exhaustion.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalFatigueHumansWorkloadWorkplaceCombined interventionControlled trialExhaustionParticipatory interventionWork-related stress

Identifiers

PMID37758838
PMCPMC10560169
OpenAlexW4387114867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.