Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37758800›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Human-machine cooperation meta-model for clinical diagnosis by adaptation to human expert's diagnostic characteristics.

Hae-Jeong Park, Sung Huhn Kim, Jae Young Choi, Dongchul Cha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hae-Jeong ParkDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Graduate School of Medical Science, Brain Korea 21 Project, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. parkhj@yonsei.ac.kr.
Sung Huhn KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae Young ChoiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Dongchul ChaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. d.cha@navercorp.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) using deep learning approaches the capabilities of human experts in medical image diagnosis. However, due to liability issues in medical decisions, AI is often relegated to an assistant role. Based on this responsibility constraint, the effective use of AI to assist human intelligence in real-world clinics remains a challenge. Given the significant inter-individual variations in clinical decisions among physicians based on their expertise, AI needs to adapt to individual experts, complementing weaknesses and enhancing strengths. For this adaptation, AI should not only acquire domain knowledge but also understand the specific human experts it assists. This study introduces a meta-model for human-machine cooperation that first evaluates each expert's class-specific diagnostic tendencies using conditional probability, based on which the meta-model adjusts the AI's predictions. This meta-model was applied to ear disease diagnosis using otoendoscopy, highlighting improved performance when incorporating individual diagnostic characteristics, even with limited evaluation data. The highest accuracy was achieved by combining each expert's conditional probabilities with machine classification probability, using optimal weights specific to each individual's overall classification accuracy. This tailored model aims to mitigate potential misjudgments due to psychological effects caused by machine suggestions and to capitalize on the unique expertise of individual clinicians.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePhysiciansHumansIntelligenceKnowledgeProbability

Identifiers

PMID37758800
PMCPMC10533492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.