ArticleScientific reports2023
Few-shot out-of-distribution detection for automated screening in retinal OCT images using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A unified deep learning application framework for forensic shoeprint analysis under data-limited conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microaneurysm segmentation under out-of-domain generalization: from diabetic retinopathy to leukemic retinopathy.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Tumor-anchored deep feature random forests for out-of-distribution detection in lung cancer segmentation.Transactions on machine learning research · 2026Article
- ROQUS: a retinal OCT quality and usability score.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- One-class support vector machines for detecting population drift in deployed machine learning medical diagnostics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anomaly Detection in Retinal OCT Images With Deep Learning-Based Knowledge Distillation.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Enhancing AI reliability: A foundation model with uncertainty estimation for optical coherence tomography-based retinal disease diagnosis.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Using Variational Autoencoders for Out of Distribution Detection in Histological Multiple Instance Learning.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2025Article
- Automated deep learning-based AMD detection and staging in real-world OCT datasets (PINNACLE study report 5).Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep neural networks have been increasingly proposed for automated screening and diagnosis of retinal diseases from optical coherence tomography (OCT), but often provide high-confidence predictions on out-of-distribution (OOD) cases, compromising their clinical usage. With this in mind, we performed an in-depth comparative analysis of the state-of-the-art uncertainty estimation methods for OOD detection in retinal OCT imaging. The analysis was performed within the use-case of automated screening and staging of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide, where we achieved a macro-average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.981 for AMD classification. We focus on a few-shot Outlier Exposure (OE) method and the detection of near-OOD cases that share pathomorphological characteristics with the inlier AMD classes. Scoring the OOD case based on the Cosine distance in the feature space from the penultimate network layer proved to be a robust approach for OOD detection, especially in combination with the OE. Using Cosine distance and only 8 outliers exposed per class, we were able to improve the near-OOD detection performance of the OE with Reject Bucket method by [Formula: see text] 10% compared to without OE, reaching an AUC of 0.937. The Cosine distance served as a robust metric for OOD detection of both known and unknown classes and should thus be considered as an alternative to the reject bucket class probability in OE approaches, especially in the few-shot scenario. The inclusion of these methodologies did not come at the expense of classification performance, and can substantially improve the reliability and trustworthiness of the resulting deep learning-based diagnostic systems in the context of retinal OCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.