Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37758754›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Few-shot out-of-distribution detection for automated screening in retinal OCT images using deep learning.

Teresa Araújo, Guilherme Aresta, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Hrvoje Bogunović

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ROQUS: a retinal OCT quality and usability score.Biomedical optics express · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa AraújoChristian Doppler Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence in Retina, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. teresa.safinisterraaraujo@meduniwien.ac.at.
Guilherme ArestaChristian Doppler Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence in Retina, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ursula Schmidt-ErfurthChristian Doppler Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence in Retina, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7788-7311
Hrvoje BogunovićChristian Doppler Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence in Retina, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. hrvoje.bogunovic@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9168-0894
Medical University of Vienna · ATAustrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence · ATChristian Doppler Laboratory for Thermoelectricity · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks have been increasingly proposed for automated screening and diagnosis of retinal diseases from optical coherence tomography (OCT), but often provide high-confidence predictions on out-of-distribution (OOD) cases, compromising their clinical usage. With this in mind, we performed an in-depth comparative analysis of the state-of-the-art uncertainty estimation methods for OOD detection in retinal OCT imaging. The analysis was performed within the use-case of automated screening and staging of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide, where we achieved a macro-average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.981 for AMD classification. We focus on a few-shot Outlier Exposure (OE) method and the detection of near-OOD cases that share pathomorphological characteristics with the inlier AMD classes. Scoring the OOD case based on the Cosine distance in the feature space from the penultimate network layer proved to be a robust approach for OOD detection, especially in combination with the OE. Using Cosine distance and only 8 outliers exposed per class, we were able to improve the near-OOD detection performance of the OE with Reject Bucket method by [Formula: see text] 10% compared to without OE, reaching an AUC of 0.937. The Cosine distance served as a robust metric for OOD detection of both known and unknown classes and should thus be considered as an alternative to the reject bucket class probability in OE approaches, especially in the few-shot scenario. The inclusion of these methodologies did not come at the expense of classification performance, and can substantially improve the reliability and trustworthiness of the resulting deep learning-based diagnostic systems in the context of retinal OCT.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMacular DegenerationArea Under CurveBehavior TherapyHumansReproducibility of ResultsTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID37758754
PMCPMC10533534
OpenAlexW4387098720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.