Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37758723›Full record

SynthesisNature communications2023

A global-temporal analysis on Phytophthora sojae resistance-gene efficacy.

Austin G McCoy, Richard R Belanger, Carl A Bradley, Daniel G Cerritos-Garcia, Vinicius C Garnica, Loren J Giesler, Pablo E Grijalba, Eduardo Guillin, Maria A Henriquez, Yong Min Kim and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RenSeq-derived SNPs used in mapping resistance toMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome-Wide Association Study for Resistance toPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparison ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 17 institutions in 4 countries.

Austin G McCoyMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. mccoyaus@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-4184
Richard R BelangerUniversité Laval, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8549-975X
Carl A BradleyUniversity of Kentucky, Princeton, KY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8334-0750
Daniel G Cerritos-GarciaUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs Mansfield, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1540-9282
Vinicius C GarnicaNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6351-4357
Loren J GieslerUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Pablo E GrijalbaUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eduardo GuillinInstituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Maria A HenriquezAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Morden, Manitoba, Canada.
Yong Min KimAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3047-8625
Dean K MalvickUniversity of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0131-8411
Rashelle L MatthiesenIowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0551-8565
Santiago X MiderosUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8988-2964
Zachary A NoelAuburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-8300
Alison E RobertsonIowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Mitchell G RothThe Ohio State University-Wooster, Wooster, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0798-9312
Clarice L SchmidtIowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Damon L SmithUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3436-3718
Adam H SparksDepartment of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0061-8359
Darcy E P TelenkoPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0357-1493
Vanessa TremblayUniversité Laval, Québec, Canada.
Owen WallyAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3580-9849
Martin I ChilversMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. chilvers@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8832-1666
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAIowa State University · USMichigan State University · USUniversité Laval · CAAuburn University · USCollege of Wooster · USNational Agricultural Technology Institute · ARNorth Carolina State University · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversidad de Buenos Aires · ARUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of Southern Queensland · AUUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant disease resistance genes are widely used in agriculture to reduce disease outbreaks and epidemics and ensure global food security. In soybean, Rps (Resistance to Phytophthora sojae) genes are used to manage Phytophthora sojae, a major oomycete pathogen that causes Phytophthora stem and root rot (PRR) worldwide. This study aims to identify temporal changes in P. sojae pathotype complexity, diversity, and Rps gene efficacy. Pathotype data was collected from 5121 isolates of P. sojae, derived from 29 surveys conducted between 1990 and 2019 across the United States, Argentina, Canada, and China. This systematic review shows a loss of efficacy of specific Rps genes utilized for disease management and a significant increase in the pathotype diversity of isolates over time. This study finds that the most widely deployed Rps genes used to manage PRR globally, Rps1a, Rps1c and Rps1k, are no longer effective for PRR management in the United States, Argentina, and Canada. This systematic review emphasizes the need to widely introduce new sources of resistance to P. sojae, such as Rps3a, Rps6, or Rps11, into commercial cultivars to effectively manage PRR going forward.

Indexed as

PhytophthoraAgricultureArgentinaCanadaGenes, Plant

Identifiers

PMID37758723
PMCPMC10533513
OpenAlexW4387090850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.