Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37758716›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Efficient optimization with higher-order ising machines.

Connor Bybee, Denis Kleyko, Dmitri E Nikonov, Amir Khosrowshahi, Bruno A Olshausen, Friedrich T Sommer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metrics for spin-based computing.Nature reviews. Physics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Connor BybeeRedwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. bybee@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6685-1228
Denis KleykoRedwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6032-6155
Dmitri E NikonovComponents Research, Intel, Hillsboro, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-1267
Amir KhosrowshahiRedwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Bruno A OlshausenRedwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Friedrich T SommerRedwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. fsommer@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6738-9263

Funding

Building analysis tools and a theory framework for inferring principles of neural computation from multi-scale organization in brain recordingsR01EB026955 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SOMMER, FRIEDRICH T · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prominent approach to solving combinatorial optimization problems on parallel hardware is Ising machines, i.e., hardware implementations of networks of interacting binary spin variables. Most Ising machines leverage second-order interactions although important classes of optimization problems, such as satisfiability problems, map more seamlessly to Ising networks with higher-order interactions. Here, we demonstrate that higher-order Ising machines can solve satisfiability problems more resource-efficiently in terms of the number of spin variables and their connections when compared to traditional second-order Ising machines. Further, our results show on a benchmark dataset of Boolean k-satisfiability problems that higher-order Ising machines implemented with coupled oscillators rapidly find solutions that are better than second-order Ising machines, thus, improving the current state-of-the-art for Ising machines.

Identifiers

PMID37758716
PMCPMC10533504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.