Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37758678›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

PIM-COVID study: protocol for a multicentre, longitudinal study measuring the psychological impact of surviving an intensive care admission due to COVID-19 on patients in the UK.

Alicia A C Waite, Brian W Johnston, Andrew J Boyle, Mary Gemma Cherry, Peter Fisher, Stephen L Brown, Christina Jones, Karen Williams, Ingeborg D Welters

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05092529 (The Psychological Impact of Surviving an Intensive Care Admission Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05092529 completednot on this map

The Psychological Impact of Surviving an Intensive Care Admission Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on Patients in the United Kingdom

TypeobservationalSponsorRoyal Liverpool University HospitalRan2020 to 2023Enrolled1,620ConditionsCOVID-19, Psychological Distress, Depression, Anxiety
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alicia A C WaiteIntensive Care Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK Alicia.Waite@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8734-994X
Brian W JohnstonIntensive Care Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Andrew J BoyleRegional Intensive Care Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Mary Gemma CherryDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Peter FisherDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen L BrownDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Christina JonesICUsteps, London, UK.
Karen WilliamsIntensive Care Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Ingeborg D WeltersIntensive Care Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3408-8798
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPsychological distress is common in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors and is anticipated in those who were treated for severe COVID-19 infection. This trainee-led, multicentre, observational, longitudinal study aims to assess the psychological outcomes of ICU survivors treated for COVID-19 infection in the UK at 3, 6 and/or 12 months after ICU discharge and explore whether there are demographic, psychosocial and clinical risk factors for psychological distress. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Questionnaires will be provided to study participants 3, 6 and/or 12 months after discharge from intensive care, assessing for anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, health-related quality of life and physical symptoms. Demographic, psychosocial and clinical data will also be collected to explore risk factors for psychological distress using latent growth curve modelling. Study participants will be eligible to complete questionnaires at any of the three time points online, by telephone or by post. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The PIM-COVID study was approved by the Health Research Authority (East Midlands - Derby Research and Ethics Committee, reference: 20/EM/0247). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05092529.

Indexed as

COVID-19Intensive Care UnitsSurvivorsAnxietyCritical CareDepressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPsychological DistressQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurveys and QuestionnairesAdult intensive & critical careAnxiety disordersCOVID-19Depression & mood disordersQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID37758678
PMCPMC10537987
OpenAlexW4387078876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.