Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37758675›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Use of a digital job-aid in improving antenatal clinical protocols and quality of care in rural primary-level health facilities in Burkina Faso: a quasi-experimental evaluation.

Abdoulaye Maïga, Anju Ogyu, Roch Modeste Millogo, Angelica Lopez-Hernandez, Matè Alonyenyo Labité, Alain Labrique, Smisha Agarwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdoulaye MaïgaInternational Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA amaiga1@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0475-1106
Anju OgyuInternational Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Roch Modeste MillogoInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Centre, Burkina Faso.
Angelica Lopez-HernandezInternational Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Matè Alonyenyo LabitéInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Centre, Burkina Faso.
Alain LabriqueInternational Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Smisha AgarwalInternational Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe assessed the impact of a digital clinical decision support (CDS) tool in improving health providers adherence to recommended antenatal protocols and service quality in rural primary-level health facilities in Burkina Faso.

designA quasi-experimental evaluation based on a cross-sectional post-intervention assessment comparing the intervention district to a comparison group. SETTING AND

participantsThe study included 331 direct observations and exit interviews of pregnant women seeking antenatal care (ANC) across 48 rural primary-level health facilities in Burkina Faso in 2021.

interventionDigital CDS tool to improve health providers adherence to recommended antenatal protocols. OUTCOME MEASURES: We analysed the quality of care on both the supply and demand sides. Quality-of-care service scores were based on actual care provided and expected care according to standards. Pregnant women's knowledge of counselling and satisfaction score after receiving care were also calculated. Other outcomes included time of clinical encounter.

resultsThe overall quality of health service provision was comparable across intervention and comparison health facilities (52% vs 51%) despite there being a significantly higher proportion of lower skilled providers in the intervention arm (42.5% vs 17.8%). On average, ANC visits were longer in the intervention area (median 24 min, IQR 18) versus comparison area (median 12 min, IQR: 8). The intervention arm had a significantly higher score difference in women's knowledge of received counselling (16.4 points, 95% CI 10.37 to 22.49), and women's satisfaction (16.18 points, 95% CI: 9.95 to 22.40).

conclusionDigital CDS tools provide a valuable opportunity to achieve substantial improvements of the quality of ANC and broadly maternal and newborn health in settings with high burden mortality and less trained health cadres when adequately implemented.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeoplePrenatal CareBurkina FasoCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancycase-control studiesprenatal diagnosisprimary health carequality in health care

Identifiers

PMID37758675
PMCPMC10537835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.