Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37758667›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2023

Associations, unions and everything in between: contextualising the role of representative health worker organisations in policy.

Veena Sriram, Sorcha A Brophy, Kartik Sharma, Maya Annie Elias, Arima Mishra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Organizational Professionalism: Role of Medical Council in Public Trust in the Profession.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Veena SriramSchool of Public Policy and Global Affairs, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada veena.sriram@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7465-5881
Sorcha A BrophyHealth Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2849-5303
Kartik SharmaSchool of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4767-3440
Maya Annie EliasSchool of Development, Azim Premji University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3855-0801
Arima MishraSchool of Development, Azim Premji University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7218-9322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Associations, unions and other organised groups representing health workers play a significant role in the development, adoption and implementation of health policy. These representative health worker organisations (RHWOs) are a key interface between employers, governments and their members (both actual and claimed), with varying degrees of influence and authority within and across countries. Existing research in global health often assumes-rather than investigates-the roles played by RHWOs in policy processes and lacks analytical specificity regarding the definitional characteristics of RHWOs. In this article, we seek to expand and complicate conceptualisations of RHWOs as key actors in global health by unpacking the heterogeneity of RHWOs and their roles in policy processes and by situating RHWOs in context. First, we define RHWOs, present a typology of RHWO dimensions and discuss perceived legitimacy of RHWOs as policy actors. Next, we unpack the roles of RHWOs in policy processes and distinguish RHWO roles in regulation from those of regulatory agencies. The final sections situate RHWOs in political and labour relations contexts, and in sociohistorical contexts, with attention to institutional frameworks, professional hierarchies and intersectional factors such as race, gender, sexuality, class, caste and religion. We conclude by outlining research gaps in the study of RHWOs and policy, and by encouraging global health researchers and practitioners to incorporate an expanded focus on these actors. Taking this approach will generate a wider range of strategies to better engage these organisations in policy processes and will ensure stronger health workforce policies globally.

Indexed as

Evidence GapsHealth PolicyGovernmentGroup ProcessesHealth PersonnelHumansHealth policyHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID37758667
PMCPMC10537963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.