Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37758449›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2023

No Signs of Adaptations for High Flight Intensity in the Mitochondrial Genome of Birds.

Santiago Claramunt, Oliver Haddrath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Santiago ClaramuntDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8926-5974
Oliver HaddrathDepartment of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Royal Ontario Museum · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial genomes are expected to show adaptations for optimizing aerobic respiration in birds that make intense use of flight. However, there is limited empirical evidence of such a relationship. We here examine correlates of several mitochondrial genome characteristics and flight use across a diverse sample of 597 bird species. We developed an index of flight use intensity that ranged from 0 in flightless species to 9 in migratory hummingbirds and examined its association with nucleobase composition, amino acid class composition, and amino acid site allelic variation using phylogenetic comparative methods. We found no evidence of mitochondrial genome adaptations to flight intensity. Neither nucleotide composition nor amino acid properties showed consistent patterns related to flight use. While specific sites in mitochondrial genes exhibited variation associated with flight intensity, there was limited association between specific amino acid residues and flight intensity levels. Our findings suggest a complex genetic architecture for aerobic performance traits, where multiple genes in both mitochondria and the nucleus may contribute to overall performance. Other factors, such as gene expression regulation and anatomical adaptations, may play a more significant role in influencing flight performance than changes in mitochondrial genes. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive genomic analyses to unravel the intricate relationship between genetic variants and aerobic performance in birds.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBirdsFlight, AnimalGenome, MitochondrialAnimalsPhylogenyaerobic metabolismavian flightcomparative analysismtDNA

Identifiers

PMID37758449
PMCPMC10563790
OpenAlexW4387079232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.