Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37758042›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2024

Improved Symptom Change Enhances Quality of Dying in Patients With Advanced Cancer: An East Asian Cross-Cultural Study.

Hsien-Liang Huang, Ping-Jen Chen, Masanori Mori, Sang-Yeon Suh, Chien-Yi Wu, Jen-Kuei Peng, Chih-Yuan Shih, Chien-An Yao, Jaw-Shiun Tsai, Tai-Yuan Chiu and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Hsien-Liang HuangDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-5596
Ping-Jen ChenDepartment of Family Medicine and Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Republic of China.
Masanori MoriDivision of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Sang-Yeon SuhDepartment of Family Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea.
Chien-Yi WuDepartment of Family Medicine and Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Republic of China.
Jen-Kuei PengDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Republic of China.
Chih-Yuan ShihDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Republic of China.
Chien-An YaoDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Republic of China.
Jaw-Shiun TsaiDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Republic of China.
Tai-Yuan ChiuDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Republic of China.
Yusuke HiratsukaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2334-3893
Sun-Hyun KimDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon, South Korea.
Tatsuya MoritaDivision of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Takashi YamaguchiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3060-0245
Satoru TsunetoDepartment of Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan.
David HuiDepartment of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2733-6607
Shao-Yi ChengDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2224-4140
National Taiwan University Hospital · TWSeirei Mikatabara General Hospital · JPCatholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital · KRDongguk University · KRKobe University · JPKyoto University · JPThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTohoku University · JPUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Japan Hospice Palliative Care Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptom burdens tend to increase for patients with cancer and their families over the disease trajectory. There is still a lack of evidence on the associations between symptom changes and the quality of dying and death. In this context, this research investigated how symptom changes influence the quality of dying and death.

methodsThis international prospective cohort study (the East Asian Collaborative Cross-Cultural Study to Elucidate the Dying Process (EASED), 2017-2019) included 22, 11, and 4 palliative care units across Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Eligible participants were adults (Japan and Korea, ≥18 years; Taiwan, ≥20 years) with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. Physical and psychological symptoms were assessed by physicians upon admission and within 3 days before death. Death quality was assessed using the Good Death Scale (GDS), developed in Taiwan. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify correlations between symptom severity changes and GDS scores.

resultsAmong 998 patients (542 [54.3%] men and 456 [45.7%] women; mean [SD] age = 70.1 [± 12.5] years), persistent dyspnea was associated with lower GDS scores when compared to stable dyspnea (β = -0.427, 95% CI = -0.783 to -0.071). Worsened (-1.381, -1.932 to -0.831) and persistent (-1.680, -2.701 to -0.659) delirium were also significantly associated with lower GDS scores.

conclusionsBetter quality of dying and death was associated with improved symptom control, especially for dyspnea and delirium. Integrating an outcome measurement for the quality of dying and death is important in the management of symptoms across the disease trajectory in a goal-concordant manner.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPalliative CareTerminal CareAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Cultural ComparisonDeliriumDyspneaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesHospicepalliative carequality of dyingsymptom controlterminally ill cancer patients

Identifiers

PMID37758042
PMCPMC10994251
OpenAlexW4387080263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.