ArticleNeuroImage2023
A representation of abstract linguistic categories in the visual system underlies successful lipreading.
Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual speech enhances phoneme separability in human superior temporal gyrus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Articulatory timing and form support distinct neural benefits during audiovisual speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Lip-Reading: Advances and Unresolved Questions in a Key Communication Skill.Audiology research · 2025Review
- Phonological Representations of Auditory and Visual Speech in the Occipito-temporal Cortex and Beyond.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Dynamic modeling of EEG responses to natural speech reveals earlier processing of predictable words.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Auditory cortex encodes lipreading information through spatially distributed activity.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- A comparison of EEG encoding models using audiovisual stimuli and their unimodal counterparts.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Modality-Specific Perceptual Learning of Vocoded Auditory versus Lipread Speech: Different Effects of Prior Information.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Differential Auditory and Visual Phase-Locking Are Observed during Audio-Visual Benefit and Silent Lip-Reading for Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Lipreading: A Review of Its Continuing Importance for Speech Recognition With an Acquired Hearing Loss and Possibilities for Effective Training.American journal of audiology · 2022Review
- Increases in sensory noise predict attentional disruptions to audiovisual speech perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is considerable debate over how visual speech is processed in the absence of sound and whether neural activity supporting lipreading occurs in visual brain areas. Much of the ambiguity stems from a lack of behavioral grounding and neurophysiological analyses that cannot disentangle high-level linguistic and phonetic/energetic contributions from visual speech. To address this, we recorded EEG from human observers as they watched silent videos, half of which were novel and half of which were previously rehearsed with the accompanying audio. We modeled how the EEG responses to novel and rehearsed silent speech reflected the processing of low-level visual features (motion, lip movements) and a higher-level categorical representation of linguistic units, known as visemes. The ability of these visemes to account for the EEG - beyond the motion and lip movements - was significantly enhanced for rehearsed videos in a way that correlated with participants' trial-by-trial ability to lipread that speech. Source localization of viseme processing showed clear contributions from visual cortex, with no strong evidence for the involvement of auditory areas. We interpret this as support for the idea that the visual system produces its own specialized representation of speech that is (1) well-described by categorical linguistic features, (2) dissociable from lip movements, and (3) predictive of lipreading ability. We also suggest a reinterpretation of previous findings of auditory cortical activation during silent speech that is consistent with hierarchical accounts of visual and audiovisual speech perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.