Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37757989›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2023

A representation of abstract linguistic categories in the visual system underlies successful lipreading.

Aaron R Nidiffer, Cody Zhewei Cao, Aisling O'Sullivan, Edmund C Lalor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Phonological Representations of Auditory and Visual Speech in the Occipito-temporal Cortex and Beyond.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Differential Auditory and Visual Phase-Locking Are Observed during Audio-Visual Benefit and Silent Lip-Reading for Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aaron R NidifferDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neuroscience, Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Cody Zhewei CaoDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Aisling O'SullivanSchool of Engineering, Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Edmund C LalorDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Neuroscience, Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA; School of Engineering, Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: Edmund_Lalor@urmc.rochester.edu.

Funding

Natural audiovisual speech encoding in the early stages of the human cortical hierarchyR01DC016297 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Matthew William Geoffrey Dye, Edmund Lalor · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is considerable debate over how visual speech is processed in the absence of sound and whether neural activity supporting lipreading occurs in visual brain areas. Much of the ambiguity stems from a lack of behavioral grounding and neurophysiological analyses that cannot disentangle high-level linguistic and phonetic/energetic contributions from visual speech. To address this, we recorded EEG from human observers as they watched silent videos, half of which were novel and half of which were previously rehearsed with the accompanying audio. We modeled how the EEG responses to novel and rehearsed silent speech reflected the processing of low-level visual features (motion, lip movements) and a higher-level categorical representation of linguistic units, known as visemes. The ability of these visemes to account for the EEG - beyond the motion and lip movements - was significantly enhanced for rehearsed videos in a way that correlated with participants' trial-by-trial ability to lipread that speech. Source localization of viseme processing showed clear contributions from visual cortex, with no strong evidence for the involvement of auditory areas. We interpret this as support for the idea that the visual system produces its own specialized representation of speech that is (1) well-described by categorical linguistic features, (2) dissociable from lip movements, and (3) predictive of lipreading ability. We also suggest a reinterpretation of previous findings of auditory cortical activation during silent speech that is consistent with hierarchical accounts of visual and audiovisual speech perception.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexSpeech PerceptionBrainHumansLipreadingPhoneticsVisual PerceptionEEGLinear modelingLipreadingVisual speech

Identifiers

PMID37757989
PMCPMC12956258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.