ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2023
Migrated intrauterine device: Case series report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The wandering intrauterine contraceptive device: An unusual case of omental IUCD migration with multimodality imaging findings.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- The "Lost" and "Found" IUD: a case of concurrent intrauterine and intraperitoneal devices with delayed recognition.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Intraluminal Appendiceal Migration of an Intrauterine Device Without Appendicitis: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic removal of a migrated copper IUD causing pelvic abscess: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Endoscopic removal of an unexpected colon foreign body.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Migration of a copper T intrauterine device: A clinical Insight into complications and diagnostic approaches.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Cystoscopic retrieval of a migrated IUD with bladder stone formation during pregnancy termination: a Case Report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Migrated intra-uterine device to infra-umbilical skin: a rare case report.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device into the bladder complicated by stone formation an exceptional complication: case report and literature review.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Case report: Uterine perforation caused by migration of intrauterine devices.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceImplantation of an intrauterine device (IUD) is a common method of contraception in Saudi Arabia. Although rare, IUD migration and colon perforation have been reported. The current report presented three cases of IUD migration into the colon and recto-uterine pouch. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: The study included a series of three cases of migrated IUDs. The first case was a 25-year-old female, Gravida 2, Para 2 + 0, at 28 week-gestation, who presented with abdominal pain with a history of IUD placement that had not been removed or imaged before. The patient submitted to the caesarian section (CS), where IUD was found in the sigmoid colon. Elective laparoscopic removal of IUD with resection and primary repair of sigmoid colon was done later. The second case was a 37-year-old female, Gravida 1, Para 1 + 0, non-pregnant hypothyroidism, and a history of IUD placement. The patient got pregnant and gave birth through CS. She was then presented with abdominal pain and requested the removal of the IUD. On colonoscopy, IUD was seen in the pouch of Douglas with no evidence of a fistulous tract. IUD was removed through laparoscopy. The third case was a 47-year-old female, Gravida 14, Para 14 + 0, with a history of previous CS presented with a missing IUD that had been inserted 20 years ago after she had five pregnancies and subsequent deliveries. On colonoscopy, IUD was embedded on the wall of the transverse colon, and through abdominal surgery, IUD was removed by cutting through the colon and primary repair was done. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: the presentation of IUD migration cases was foundto vary according to the site of migration and type of IUD.however the cases are usually present with abdominal pain. An abdominal pelvic imaging with CT in these patients are essential in diagnosis. Retrival of migrating IUDs may be done through colonoscopy, laparoscopy, and in some cases with adhesion laparotomy is the solution.
conclusionAbdominal and pelvic CT scan are very important in the diagnosis and the localization of IUD. Elective colonoscopy and laparoscopy are successful management approaches for these cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.