Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37757486›Full record

SynthesisSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2023

Unpacking reappraisal: a systematic review of fMRI studies of distancing and reinterpretation.

Bryan T Denny, Mallory L Jungles, Pauline N Goodson, Eva E Dicker, Julia Chavez, Jenna S Jones, Richard B Lopez

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Shared and unique neural correlates of reappraisal generation and implementation.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Comparing the neural bases of self- and social-reappraisal.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bryan T DennyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3625-4486
Mallory L JunglesDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Pauline N GoodsonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Eva E DickerDepartment of Psychology, Seattle University, Seattle, WA 98122, USA.
Julia ChavezDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Jenna S JonesDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Richard B LopezDepartment of Psychological & Cognitive Sciences, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.

Funding

Neural mechanisms of enhancing emotion regulation in bereaved spousesR21AG061597 · NIA · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI DENNY, BRYAN THOMAS, FAGUNDES, CHRISTOPHER PAUL · 2020 to 2021
$445k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, a substantial volume of work has examined the neural mechanisms of cognitive reappraisal. Distancing and reinterpretation are two frequently used tactics through which reappraisal can be implemented. Theoretical frameworks and prior evidence have suggested that the specific tactic through which one employs reappraisal entails differential neural and psychological mechanisms. Thus, we were motivated to assess the neural mechanisms of this distinction by examining the overlap and differentiation exhibited by the neural correlates of distancing (specifically via objective appraisal) and reinterpretation. We analyzed 32 published functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies in healthy adults using multilevel kernel density analysis. Results showed that distancing relative to reinterpretation uniquely recruited right bilateral dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) and left posterior parietal cortex, previously associated with mentalizing, selective attention and working memory. Reinterpretation relative to distancing uniquely recruited left bilateral ventrolateral PFC (VLPFC), previously associated with response selection and inhibition. Further, distancing relative to reinterpretation was associated with greater prevalence of bilateral amygdala attenuation during reappraisal. Finally, a behavioral meta-analysis showed efficacy for both reappraisal tactics. These results are consistent with prior theoretical models for the functional neural architecture of reappraisal via distancing and reinterpretation and suggest potential future applications in region-of-interest specification and neural network analysis in studies focusing on specific reappraisal tactics.

Indexed as

EmotionsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAmygdalaAttentionBrain MappingCognitionHumansParietal Lobeemotion regulationmeta-analysispsychological distancingreappraisalreinterpretation

Identifiers

PMID37757486
PMCPMC10561539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.