Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37756695›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

A cell-level discriminative neural network model for diagnosis of blood cancers.

Edgar E Robles, Ye Jin, Padhraic Smyth, Richard H Scheuermann, Jack D Bui, Huan-You Wang, Jean Oak, Yu Qian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Deep Learning in Hematology: From Molecules to Patients.Clinical hematology international · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Edgar E RoblesDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6128-3268
Ye JinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Padhraic SmythDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, United States.
Richard H ScheuermannDepartment of Informatics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States.
Jack D BuiDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, United States.
Huan-You WangDepartment of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, United States.
Jean OakDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Yu QianDepartment of Informatics, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, United States.
J. Craig Venter Institute · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California San Diego · USHarvard University · USStanford University · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
Transformative Computational Infrastructures for Cell-Based Biomarker DiagnosticsU01TR001801 · NCATS · J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI QIAN, YU, SCHEUERMANN, RICHARD H · 2016 to 2020
$4.0M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR001801NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationPrecise identification of cancer cells in patient samples is essential for accurate diagnosis and clinical monitoring but has been a significant challenge in machine learning approaches for cancer precision medicine. In most scenarios, training data are only available with disease annotation at the subject or sample level. Traditional approaches separate the classification process into multiple steps that are optimized independently. Recent methods either focus on predicting sample-level diagnosis without identifying individual pathologic cells or are less effective for identifying heterogeneous cancer cell phenotypes.

resultsWe developed a generalized end-to-end differentiable model, the Cell Scoring Neural Network (CSNN), which takes sample-level training data and predicts the diagnosis of the testing samples and the identity of the diagnostic cells in the sample, simultaneously. The cell-level density differences between samples are linked to the sample diagnosis, which allows the probabilities of individual cells being diagnostic to be calculated using backpropagation. We applied CSNN to two independent clinical flow cytometry datasets for leukemia diagnosis. In both qualitative and quantitative assessments, CSNN outperformed preexisting neural network modeling approaches for both cancer diagnosis and cell-level classification. Post hoc decision trees and 2D dot plots were generated for interpretation of the identified cancer cells, showing that the identified cell phenotypes match the cancer endotypes observed clinically in patient cohorts. Independent data clustering analysis confirmed the identified cancer cell populations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of CSNN and datasets used in the experiments are publicly available on GitHub (http://github.com/erobl/csnn). Raw FCS files can be downloaded from FlowRepository (ID: FR-FCM-Z6YK).

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsNeoplasmsFlow CytometryHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSoftware

Identifiers

PMID37756695
PMCPMC10563151
OpenAlexW4387113587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.