ArticleJournal of animal science2023
Effects of the F94L myostatin gene mutation in beef × dairy crossed cattle on muscle fiber type, live performance, carcass characteristics, and boxed beef and retail cut yields.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review of myostatin gene mutations: Enhancing meat production and potential in livestock genetic selection.Open veterinary journal · 2024Review
- A review of myostatin gene mutations: Enhancing meat production and potential in livestock genetic selection.Open veterinary journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Producer live performance data and carcasses from steers (n = 116) resulting from the mating of four Limousin/Angus sires heterozygous for the F94L myostatin mutation to Jersey/Holstein dams were utilized to evaluate the effects of one copy of the F94L allele on live performance, carcass traits and USDA grades, and boxed beef and retail yields. Slaughter data were collected at time of harvest and carcass data were collected 48 hours postmortem. One side from each of the 58 carcasses was fabricated into boxed beef and retail cuts by experienced lab personnel 5-8 d postmortem. One copy of the F94L allele did not affect gestation length, birth weight, percentage of unassisted births, feedlot average daily gain, live weight at harvest, hot carcass weight, or dressing percentage (P > 0.05). Muscle fiber analysis indicated that the increase in muscularity by the F94L allele in the semitendinosus and longissimus was likely due to hyperplasia as there was a 19% increase in the quantity of myosin heavy chain type IIA and IIX fibers in the semitendinosus (P < 0.05) with no effect on muscle fiber size (P > 0.05). Carcasses from steers with one F94L allele had larger ribeye areas (99.2 vs. 92.3 sq.cm.), greater ribeye width:length ratios (0.498 vs. 0.479), lower USDA yield grades (2.21 vs. 2.66), and lower marbling scores (438 vs. 480) (P < 0.05). Additionally, for boxed beef yields, one F94L allele, vs. zero F94L alleles, increased (P < 0.05) 85/15 trimmings (+0.59%), top round (+0.28%), strip loin (+0.12%), eye round (+0.11%), tenderloin (+0.07%), boneless foreshank (+0.07%), cap/wedge (+0.06%), and tri-tip (+0.04%). Overall, carcasses from steers with one F94L allele had a greater boxed beef yield (+1.06%), boxed beef plus 85/15 trimmings yield (+1.65%), and total retail cuts plus ground beef 85/15 yield (+1.78%) than carcasses from steers with zero F94L alleles (P < 0.05). One copy of the F94L allele utilized in beef-on-dairy breeding system had no significant impact on live performance traits but resulted in lower marbling scores and increased muscularity as evidenced through larger, more beef-shaped ribeyes, lower USDA yield grades, and greater carcass cutout yields (both boxed beef and retail yields).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.