Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37756500›Full record

Trial reportAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2023

Effect of a Workshop to Break the Bias Habit for Internal Medicine Faculty: A Multisite Cluster Randomized Controlled Study.

Molly Carnes, Jennifer Sheridan, Eve Fine, You-Geon Lee, Amarette Filut

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Diversifying the Interventional Cardiology Workforce: Why It Matters and How to Achieve It.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Acknowledging and Addressing Microaggressions: A Virtual Experiential Learning Approach for Faculty.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Molly CarnesM. Carnes is professor emeritus, Departments of Medicine, Psychiatry, and Industrial Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4208-0091 .
Jennifer SheridanJ. Sheridan is executive and research director and distinguished scientist, University of Wisconsin-Madison Inclusion in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Eve FineE. Fine is emeritus director of curriculum development and implementation, WISELI, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
You-Geon LeeY.-G. Lee is a researcher, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Amarette FilutA. Filut is program manager, Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Maximizing Investigator's Research Award: Diversifying the Scientific WorkforceR35GM122557 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CARNES, MOLLY L. · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecognition that cultural stereotypes can unintentionally perpetuate inequities throughout academic medicine has led to calls for "implicit bias training" without strong evidence to support these recommendations and some evidence of potential harm. The authors sought to determine the effectiveness of a single 3-hour workshop in helping department of medicine faculty overcome implicit stereotype-based bias and in improving the climate in the working environment.

methodA multisite cluster randomized controlled study (October 2017 to April 2021) with clustering at the level of divisions within departments and participant-level analysis of survey responses involved 8,657 faculty in 204 divisions in 19 departments of medicine: 4,424 in the intervention group (1,526 attended a workshop) and 4,233 in the control group. Online surveys at baseline (3,764/8,657 = 43.48% response rate) and 3 months after the workshop (2,962/7,715 = 38.39% response rate) assessed bias awareness, bias-reducing intentional behavioral change, and perceptions of division climate.

resultsAt 3 months, faculty in the intervention vs control divisions showed greater increases in awareness of personal bias vulnerability ( b = 0.190 [95% CI, 0.031 to 0.349], P = .02), bias reduction self-efficacy ( b = 0.097 [95% CI, 0.010 to 0.184], P = .03), and taking action to reduce bias ( b = 0.113 [95% CI, 0.007 to 0.219], P = .04). The workshop had no effect on climate or burnout, but slightly increased perceptions of respectful division meetings ( b = 0.072 [95% CI, 0.0003 to 0.143], P = .049).

conclusionsResults of this study should give confidence to those designing prodiversity interventions for faculty in academic medical centers that a single workshop which promotes awareness of stereotype-based implicit bias, explains and labels common bias concepts, and provides evidence-based strategies for participants to practice appears to have no harms and may have significant benefits in empowering faculty to break the bias habit.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalHabitsBiasHumansSelf Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID37756500
PMCPMC10545901
OpenAlexW4377691959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.