Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37756305›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

TumorDetNet: A unified deep learning model for brain tumor detection and classification.

Naeem Ullah, Ali Javed, Ali Alhazmi, Syed M Hasnain, Ali Tahir, Rehan Ashraf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hybrid fractal ConvXGBNet for brain tumor classification with log-cosh dice loss - cascaded V-Net based segmentation based on MRI images.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Naeem UllahDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan.
Ali JavedDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan.
Ali AlhazmiCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Syed M HasnainDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Kobar, Saudi Arabia.
Ali TahirCollege of Computer Science and Information Technology, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Rehan AshrafDepartment of Computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6627-9820
Jazan University · SAUniversity of Engineering and Technology Taxila · PKNational Textile University · PKPrince Mohammad bin Fahd University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of the brain tumor type at an earlier stage is crucial for the treatment process and helps to save the lives of a large number of people worldwide. Because they are non-invasive and spare patients from having an unpleasant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are frequently employed to identify tumors. The manual identification of tumors is difficult and requires considerable time due to the large number of three-dimensional images that an MRI scan of one patient's brain produces from various angles. Moreover, the variations in location, size, and shape of the brain tumor also make it challenging to detect and classify different types of tumors. Thus, computer-aided diagnostics (CAD) systems have been proposed for the detection of brain tumors. In this paper, we proposed a novel unified end-to-end deep learning model named TumorDetNet for brain tumor detection and classification. Our TumorDetNet framework employs 48 convolution layers with leaky ReLU (LReLU) and ReLU activation functions to compute the most distinctive deep feature maps. Moreover, average pooling and a dropout layer are also used to learn distinctive patterns and reduce overfitting. Finally, one fully connected and a softmax layer are employed to detect and classify the brain tumor into multiple types. We assessed the performance of our method on six standard Kaggle brain tumor MRI datasets for brain tumor detection and classification into (malignant and benign), and (glioma, pituitary, and meningioma). Our model successfully identified brain tumors with remarkable accuracy of 99.83%, classified benign and malignant brain tumors with an ideal accuracy of 100%, and meningiomas, pituitary, and gliomas tumors with an accuracy of 99.27%. These outcomes demonstrate the potency of the suggested methodology for the reliable identification and categorization of brain tumors.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGliomaMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaBrainHumansRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID37756305
PMCPMC10530039
OpenAlexW4387092898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.