Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37756082›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2023

Endoscopic Retrieval of Esophageal and Gastric Foreign Bodies in Cats and Dogs: A Retrospective Study of 92 Cases.

Giulia Maggi, Mattia Tessadori, Maria Luisa Marenzoni, Francesco Porciello, Domenico Caivano, Maria Chiara Marchesi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inadvertent removal of a needle foreign bodyThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giulia MaggiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126 Perugia, Italy.
Mattia Tessadori"Ponte Felcino" Veterinary Clinic, Via della Ghisa 3, 06134 Perugia, Italy.
Maria Luisa MarenzoniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4270-4263
Francesco PorcielloDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126 Perugia, Italy.
Domenico CaivanoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8540-4853
Maria Chiara MarchesiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126 Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal and gastric foreign bodies (FBs) commonly occur in small animal practices, and their endoscopic removal has been previously reported. However, few studies reported the endoscopic instruments used for the retrieval attempt and the time spent for endoscopic removal. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the factors that can influence the success rate and timing of the endoscopic retrieval of FBs. The medical records of 92 animals undergoing endoscopic removal of esophageal (n = 12) and gastric (n = 84) FBs have been reviewed. Two dogs had FBs in both the esophagus and stomach. From medical records and video recordings, there were extrapolated data on signalment, clinical signs, endoscopic devices used, success of retrieval, and duration of endoscopy. Endoscopic removal of FBs was successful in 88% cases, and the mean time spent for the extraction was 59.74 min (range, 10-120 min). The success rate and timing for the removal of endoscopic foreign bodies (EFBs) are influenced by several factors in our population: medium-breed dogs, adult animals, and localization of FBs in the body of the stomach increased the probability of failure during the endoscopic retrieval attempt. Conversely, the success and timing of the retrieval of EFBs were higher in puppies and with increasing operator's experience. Moreover, the use of combination devices such as polypectomy snare and grasping forceps negatively influenced the success of extraction of FBs. Further prospective and comparative studies in a large and multicentric population of patients can be useful to create interventional endoscopic guidelines, as in human medicine.

Indexed as

catsdogsendoscopyesophagusforeign bodiesgastric

Identifiers

PMID37756082
PMCPMC10538072
OpenAlexW4386456782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.