Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37755989›Full record

ReviewToxins2023

Recent Developments in Vaccine Design: From Live Vaccines to Recombinant Toxin Vaccines.

Sonal Gupta, Sabine Pellett

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Botulinum neurotoxin: from molecular pathogenesis to emerging countermeasures.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. AgainstToxins · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Bacterial exotoxins in medicine: potential value and perspectives.International journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Beyond Antibiotics: What the Future Holds.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonal GuptaDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Sabine PellettDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8186-8810
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Vaccines Against BotulismR01AI118389 · NIAID · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BARBIERI, JOSEPH T, PELLETT, SABINE · 2015 to 2024
$6.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118389NIH HHS 2R01AI118389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines are one of the most effective strategies to prevent pathogen-induced illness in humans. The earliest vaccines were based on live inoculations with low doses of live or related pathogens, which carried a relatively high risk of developing the disease they were meant to prevent. The introduction of attenuated and killed pathogens as vaccines dramatically reduced these risks; however, attenuated live vaccines still carry a risk of reversion to a pathogenic strain capable of causing disease. This risk is completely eliminated with recombinant protein or subunit vaccines, which are atoxic and non-infectious. However, these vaccines require adjuvants and often significant optimization to induce robust T-cell responses and long-lasting immune memory. Some pathogens produce protein toxins that cause or contribute to disease. To protect against the effects of such toxins, chemically inactivated toxoid vaccines have been found to be effective. Toxoid vaccines are successfully used today at a global scale to protect against tetanus and diphtheria. Recent developments for toxoid vaccines are investigating the possibilities of utilizing recombinant protein toxins mutated to eliminate biologic activity instead of chemically inactivated toxins. Finally, one of the most contemporary approaches toward vaccine design utilizes messenger RNA (mRNA) as a vaccine candidate. This approach was used globally to protect against coronavirus disease during the COVID-19 pandemic that began in 2019, due to its advantages of quick production and scale-up, and effectiveness in eliciting a neutralizing antibody response. Nonetheless, mRNA vaccines require specialized storage and transport conditions, posing challenges for low- and middle-income countries. Among multiple available technologies for vaccine design and formulation, which technology is most appropriate? This review focuses on the considerable developments that have been made in utilizing diverse vaccine technologies with a focus on vaccines targeting bacterial toxins. We describe how advancements in vaccine technology, combined with a deeper understanding of pathogen-host interactions, offer exciting and promising avenues for the development of new and improved vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19Toxins, BiologicalBacterial VaccinesHumansPandemicsTetanus ToxoidVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, SyntheticBacterial VaccinesTetanus ToxoidToxins, BiologicalVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, SyntheticbotulismCOVID-19mRNA vaccinesrecombinant vaccinestetanustoxintoxoidvaccine

Identifiers

PMID37755989
PMCPMC10536331
OpenAlexW4386542350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.