Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37755980›Full record

ArticleToxins2023

The Presence of

Callum Whyte, Sarah C Swan, Andrew D Turner, Robert G Hatfield, Elaine Mitchell, Shannon Lafferty, Nadine Morrell, Stepahanie Rowland-Pilgrim, Keith Davidson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Callum WhyteScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3172-5517
Sarah C SwanScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0118-5468
Andrew D TurnerCentre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, The Nothe, Barrack Road, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1390-0924
Robert G HatfieldCentre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, The Nothe, Barrack Road, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, UK.
Elaine MitchellScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA, UK.
Shannon LaffertyScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA, UK.
Nadine MorrellCentre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, The Nothe, Barrack Road, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, UK.
Stepahanie Rowland-PilgrimCentre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, The Nothe, Barrack Road, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, UK.
Keith DavidsonScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9269-3227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The farming of shellfish plays an important role in providing sustainable economic growth in coastal, rural communities in Scotland and acts as an anchor industry, supporting a range of ancillary jobs in the processing, distribution and exporting industries. The Scottish Government is encouraging shellfish farmers to double their economic contribution by 2030. These farmers face numerous challenges to reach this goal, among which is the problem caused by toxin-producing microplankton that can contaminate their shellfish, leading to harvesting site closure and the recall of product. Food Standards Scotland, a non-ministerial department of the Scottish Government, carries out a monitoring programme for both the toxin-producing microplankton and the toxins in shellfish flesh, with farms being closed when official thresholds for any toxin are breached. The farm remains closed until testing for the problematic toxin alone, often diarrhetic shellfish toxin (DST), shows the site to have dropped below the regulatory threshold. While this programme has proved to be robust, questions remain regarding the other toxins that may be present at a closed site. In this study, we tested archival material collected during site closures but only tested for DSTs as part of the official control monitoring. We found the presence of amnesic shellfish toxin (AST) in low concentrations in the majority of sites tested. In one case, the level of AST breached the official threshold. This finding has implications for AST monitoring programmes around Europe.

Indexed as

DiatomsMarine ToxinsAquacultureSeafoodShellfishMarine ToxinsaquacultureDinophysismicroplanktonmonitoringNorth AtlanticPseudo-nitzschia australisshellfishtoxins

Identifiers

PMID37755980
PMCPMC10536095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.