Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37755957›Full record

ReviewToxins2023

Unveiling the Clinical Benefits of High-Volume Hemodiafiltration: Optimizing the Removal of Medium-Weight Uremic Toxins and Beyond.

Cristian Pedreros-Rosales, Aquiles Jara, Eduardo Lorca, Sergio Mezzano, Roberto Pecoits-Filho, Patricia Herrera

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Cristian Pedreros-RosalesDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-1338-0503
Aquiles JaraDepartamento de Nefrología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile.
Eduardo LorcaDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Facultad de Medicina, Campus Oriente, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 7500922, Chile.
Sergio MezzanoInstituto de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Austral, Valdivia 5110566, Chile.
Roberto Pecoits-FilhoArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA.
Patricia HerreraDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Facultad de Medicina, Campus Oriente, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 7500922, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-2218-2776
Austral University of Chile · CLHospital del Salvador · CLPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRUniversity of Chile · CLUniversity of Concepción · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dialysis treatment has improved the survival of patients with kidney failure. However, the hospitalization and mortality rates remain alarmingly high, primarily due to incomplete uremic toxin elimination. High-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF) has emerged as a promising approach that significantly improves patient outcomes by effectively eliminating medium and large uremic toxins, which explains its increasing adoption, particularly in Europe and Japan. Interest in this therapy has grown following the findings of the recently published CONVINCE study, as well as the need to understand the mechanisms behind the benefits. This comprehensive review aims to enhance the scientific understanding by explaining the underlying physiological mechanisms that contribute to the positive effects of HDF in terms of short-term benefits, like hemodynamic tolerance and cardiovascular disease. Additionally, it explores the rationale behind the medium-term clinical benefits, including phosphorus removal, the modulation of inflammation and oxidative stress, anemia management, immune response modulation, nutritional effects, the mitigation of bone disorders, neuropathy relief, and amyloidosis reduction. This review also analyzes the impact of HDF on patient-reported outcomes and mortality. Considering the importance of applying personalized uremic toxin removal strategies tailored to the unique needs of each patient, high-volume HDF appears to be the most effective treatment to date for patients with renal failure. This justifies the need to prioritize its application in clinical practice, initially focusing on the groups with the greatest potential benefits and subsequently extending its use to a larger number of patients.

Indexed as

HemodiafiltrationUremiaUremic ToxinsAnimalsHumansUremic Toxinscardiovascular diseasedialysishemodiafiltrationhemodynamic toleranceinflammationkidney failuremortalityoxidative stresspatient-reported outcomesuremic toxins

Identifiers

PMID37755957
PMCPMC10535648
OpenAlexW4386255727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.