Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37755862›Full record

ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Muscle Activation and Ground Reaction Force between Single-Leg Drop Landing and Jump Landing among Young Females during Weight-Acceptance Phase.

Metaneeya Pilanthananond, Kittichai Tharawadeepimuk, Vitoon Saengsirisuwan, Weerawat Limroongreungrat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Metaneeya PilanthananondDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3792-4103
Kittichai TharawadeepimukCollege of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5157-5168
Vitoon SaengsirisuwanDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Weerawat LimroongreungratCollege of Sports Science and Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3431-1793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-leg drop landing (SLDL) and jump landing (SLJL) are frequently used as assessment tools for identifying potential high-risk movement patterns; thus, understanding differences in neuromuscular responses between these types of landings is essential. This study aimed to compare lower extremity neuromuscular responses between the SLDL and SLJL. Thirteen female participants performed an SLDL and SLJL from a 30-cm box height. Vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), time to peak vGRF, and surface electromyography (sEMG) data were collected. Continuous neuromuscular responses, peak vGRF, and time to peak vGRF were compared between the tasks. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis demonstrated that the SLJL had a significantly higher sEMG activity in the rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM) within the first 10% of the landing phase compared with SLDL. At 20-30% of the landing phase, sEMGs in the RF and VL during the SLDL were significantly higher compared with SLJL (

Indexed as

EMGfemalelower limbneuromuscular controlsingle-leg landing

Identifiers

PMID37755862
PMCPMC10536380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.