Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37755615›Full record

ArticleTheory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften2023

Matrix stability and bifurcation analysis by a network-based approach.

Zhenzhen Zhao, Ruoyu Tang, Ruiqi Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhenzhen ZhaoDepartment of Mathematics, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
Ruoyu TangDepartment of Mathematics, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
Ruiqi WangDepartment of Mathematics, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China. rqwang@shu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a network-based methodology to investigate the problems related to matrix stability and bifurcations in nonlinear dynamical systems. By matching a matrix with a network, i.e., interaction graph, we propose a new network-based matrix analysis method by proving a theorem about matrix determinant under which matrix stability can be considered in terms of feedback loops. Especially, the approach can tell us how a node, a path, or a feedback loop in the interaction graph affects matrix stability. In addition, the roles played by a node, a path, or a feedback loop in determining bifurcations in nonlinear dynamical systems can also be revealed. Therefore, the approach can help us to screen optimal node or node combinations. By perturbing them, unstable matrices can be stabilized more efficiently or bifurcations can be induced more easily to realize desired state transitions. To illustrate feasibility and efficiency of the approach, some simple matrices are used to show how single or combinatorial perturbations affect matrix stability and induce bifurcations. In addition, the main idea is also illustrated through a biological problem related to T cell development with three nodes: TCF-1, GATA3, and PU.1, which can be considered to be a three-variable nonlinear dynamical system. The approach is especially helpful in understanding crucial roles of single or molecule combinations in biomolecular networks. The approach presented here can be expected to analyze other biological networks related to cell fate transitions and systematic perturbation strategy selection.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsComputer SimulationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansNonlinear DynamicsT-LymphocytesBifurcationEigenvaluesFeedback loopsInteraction graphMatrix stability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.